2005
DOI: 10.1115/1.2187033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directional, Regional, and Layer Variations of Mechanical Properties of Esophageal Tissue and its Interpretation Using a Structure-Based Constitutive Model

Abstract: The esophagus, like other soft tissues, exhibits nonlinear and anisotropic mechanical properties. As a composite structure, the properties of the outer muscle and inner mucosal layer are different. It is expected that the complex mechanical properties will induce nonhomogeneous stress distributions in the wall and nonuniform tissue remodeling. Both are important factors which influence the function of mechanosensitive receptor located in various layers of the wall. Hence, the characterization of the mechanical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the same framework, a similar constitutive model was used to describe the mechanical properties of oesophageal tissue by Yang et al (2006). As with the model in Zulliger et al (2004a), they used an engagement stretch associated with the un-crimping of collagen fibres.…”
Section: (B) Modelling Other Soft Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the same framework, a similar constitutive model was used to describe the mechanical properties of oesophageal tissue by Yang et al (2006). As with the model in Zulliger et al (2004a), they used an engagement stretch associated with the un-crimping of collagen fibres.…”
Section: (B) Modelling Other Soft Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous study [9] , it was proved that the porcine esophagus has similarities with the human being's esophagus in terms of both axial length (25-30 cm for the pig 3-4 mo old vs 25 cm for an adult) and tensile strengths (circumferential and axial strengths are 1.2 and 3.7 MPa for the muscle and 1.6 and 8.7 MPa for the mucosasubmucosa [9] vs 1.4 and 2.2 MPa for the entire wall). Since detailed geometrical and mechanical parameters for the human's esophagus were not available for our simulation, those for the porcine esophagus were taken as the representative so that the effects of the variations in mechanical properties on the efficiency of food transport could be examined.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A structure-based constitutive model, which has been successfully applied for the esophageal tissue [9] , was adopted in the simulation. With this model, the esophageal wall was modeled as an isotropic matrix of elastin reinforced with collagen fibers.…”
Section: Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average MSEs from the curve fits were compared to the macroscopic incompressible Mooney-Rivlin (MR) and neo-Hookean (NH) models (Eqs. (14) and (15) applied to the ECM) in Fig. 8.…”
Section: Estimation Of Geometric Variables and Fibril Properties Frommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early efforts to model the collagen fibril component of the ECM directly integrated parameters such as fibril undulation during tension, initial orientation distribution and volume fraction of fibrils into traditional continuum models [12][13][14][15]. A direct implementation of microstructural features in fibrous networks was developed by Wang et al for battery substrate applications [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%