2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-3203(02)00263-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directional relative position between objects in image processing: a comparison between fuzzy approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Objects shapes are even explicitly considered in the morphological method, and Bloch has shown that the resulting description better fit the intuition in comparison to other positioning descriptions based on histograms [BR03]. F-templates and morphological approach provide two different ways to build spatial templates, and Matsakis pointed out the equivalence of the two definitions under some conditions [MWN10].…”
Section: In the Image Processing Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Objects shapes are even explicitly considered in the morphological method, and Bloch has shown that the resulting description better fit the intuition in comparison to other positioning descriptions based on histograms [BR03]. F-templates and morphological approach provide two different ways to build spatial templates, and Matsakis pointed out the equivalence of the two definitions under some conditions [MWN10].…”
Section: In the Image Processing Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the second type, the adequation between B and the fuzzy dilated region can be evaluated. Other fuzzy approaches to this type of relation are reviewed in [39]. This example also highlights another important issue, which concerns the representation, for which several forms can be interesting, depending on the raised question.…”
Section: Spatial Relations and Spatial Reasoningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 3D (using spherical coordinates) the direction is represented by two angles, that are denoted by α 1 and α 2 (with α 1 ∈ [0, 2π[ and α 2 ∈ [−π/2, π/2], the 2D case corresponding to α 2 = 0) [29]. Given an axis of reference, say the x axis denoted by u x , for each pair of points (p 1 , p 2 ) with p 1 ∈ A 1 and p 2 ∈ A 2 , the angles between the axis and the segment joining these two points, − − → p 1 p 2 , are computed: α 2 is the angle between − − → p 1 p 2 and its projection on the x-y plane and α 1 is the angle between this projection and u x .…”
Section: Modeling K1mentioning
confidence: 99%