2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-ipr.2015.0347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directional SUSAN image boundary detection of breast thermogram

Abstract: Thermography of the breast has been shown to be well suited to detect early signs of breast cancer. This study proposes a novel method for boundary detection of breast thermography images using directional SUSAN method. Among breast thermography image processing steps, breast isolation from background and from each other is an essential stage for proper detection of breast cancer. For this purpose, in this study, breast boundary is grouped into three regions depending on the region property. The algorithm of b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study in [61] proposed a novel method to detect the boundary of breast thermograms using a Single Univalue Segment Assimilating Nucleus (SUSAN); an edge-based segmentation technique. e Hough transform was used to determine the center points of each breast after the armpit region by hand.…”
Section: Work On Breastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study in [61] proposed a novel method to detect the boundary of breast thermograms using a Single Univalue Segment Assimilating Nucleus (SUSAN); an edge-based segmentation technique. e Hough transform was used to determine the center points of each breast after the armpit region by hand.…”
Section: Work On Breastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satisfactory results are obtained but with certain limitations with generalization. Elham Mahmoudzadeh et al 18 proposed a novel method for boundary detection. Here breast boundary is grouped into three regions depending on region property.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, there are many new models and algorithms for image denoising and edge detection [7] [8] . However, there is no quantitative numerical standard for the evaluation of edge detection results, which is often judged by the subjective evaluation method of the naked eyes [9][10] [11] .Due to the subjectivity of subjective evaluation methods, even for the same test results, the evaluation results are often different in different environments and different atmospheres [12][13] [14] .Therefore, a specific quantitative numerical index to evaluate the quality of the detection results is needed to be establish. Generally speaking, for mainstream computer vision, the results of edge detection should meet the following requirements, namely, canny proposed three criteria of edge detection in 1986 [15][16] [17] [18] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%