2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2018.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directional wave-in-deck loading on offshore structures with porous and plated decks with supporting I-beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note an obvious second peak in the vertical force time series of both experimental and numerical results, which is a robust feature and also present in previous experiments (Kendon et al, 2010;Abdussamie et al, 2017;Sivagamasundari and Sannasiraj, 2020;Duong et al, 2021) and numerical studies (Wu et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2018). However, no explanation was given in these studies.…”
Section: Wave-in-deck Loads On a Solid Decksupporting
confidence: 51%
“…It is interesting to note an obvious second peak in the vertical force time series of both experimental and numerical results, which is a robust feature and also present in previous experiments (Kendon et al, 2010;Abdussamie et al, 2017;Sivagamasundari and Sannasiraj, 2020;Duong et al, 2021) and numerical studies (Wu et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2018). However, no explanation was given in these studies.…”
Section: Wave-in-deck Loads On a Solid Decksupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Having considered a comprehensive set of experimental data, this final sub-section compares lma calculations with recent cfd simulations by Chen et al (2018). Whilst several earlier studies have compared laboratory data with cfd calculations (see, for example, Iwanowski et al (2014) and Abdussamie et al (2014)), the Chen et al (2018) data concern multiple topside structures (see below) subject to varying inundation. In each case the global wid loads arising in a (full-scale) water depth of d = 116.9 m are provided.…”
Section: Comparisons To Direct Cfd Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Setting aside these issues, it should be noted that the additional details achieved within a cfd calculation come at a much greater computational cost. For example, for each load case in Figure 16, Chen et al (2018) reported 18 hours on a high-performance server, utilising 256 processors to achieve satisfactory convergence. For d irregular waves, particularly breaking waves, it would be expected to take considerably longer; the reason being that both the number of discretised cells and the simulated time-steps need to be significantly increased.…”
Section: Comparisons To Direct Cfd Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studies on wave-in-deck loads focus on head-on wave impingement whereas wave-in-deck loads due to waves incident from oblique directions are rarely reported. Numerical simulations for oblique wave-in-deck loads were presented in Iwanowski et al (2002), Brodtkorb (2008) and Chen et al (2018). However, in these studies, only numerical validations were performed against either two-dimensional experiments or empirical formulations due to a lack of experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%