2001
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directionality of DNA replication fork movement strongly affects the generation of spontaneous mutations in Escherichia coli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Testing bidirectionality of transfer: Results obtained in E. coli suggest a bias in the preferred direction of mutagenic templating between the two potential donor/recipient elements of a QP (Trinh and Sinden 1991;Rosche et al 1997;Viswanathan et al 2000;Yoshiyama et al 2001). When the direction of DNA synthesis is fixed, as it is in E. coli, such polarity might reflect an underlying difference in the vulnerabilities of the leading and lagging strands or perhaps an association with the direction of transcription (Yoshiyama and Maki 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Testing bidirectionality of transfer: Results obtained in E. coli suggest a bias in the preferred direction of mutagenic templating between the two potential donor/recipient elements of a QP (Trinh and Sinden 1991;Rosche et al 1997;Viswanathan et al 2000;Yoshiyama et al 2001). When the direction of DNA synthesis is fixed, as it is in E. coli, such polarity might reflect an underlying difference in the vulnerabilities of the leading and lagging strands or perhaps an association with the direction of transcription (Yoshiyama and Maki 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies of quasipalindrome-associated mutation have established a strand bias with respect to replication (Rosche et al 1997(Rosche et al , 1998Yoshiyama et al 2001;Yoshiyama and Maki 2003). In most cases, it is not possible to distinguish a simple intramolecular template switch in a hairpin structure from the more complex intermolecular template switch to the sister strand across the replication fork (Figure 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mutations typically involve replacement of one large sequence tract (10-19 bp) with a similar-sized tract of unrelated sequence (10-28 bp). We speculated that these mutations were the result of sequence substitution mutations (Yoshiyama et al 2001). However, complementary sequences near the inserted tracts were not found, ruling this explanation out.…”
Section: Mutational Spectrum Of the Rdna Polymorphismsmentioning
confidence: 99%