2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
262
0
21

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 427 publications
(302 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
19
262
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, mothers' constraining verbal expressions and pressuring language have been negatively related to children's intrinsic motivation (Deci, Driver, Hotchkiss, Robbins, & McDougal-Wilson, 1993). Similar findings have also been reported in the educational setting in which controlling teachers also tend to stress personal control, prevent children from expressing opinions which differ from their own, and use controlling vocalisations (Assor, Kaplan, Kanat-Maymon, & Roth, 2005;Reeve & Jang 2006). Not letting children work at their own pace, monopolising the conversation, using orders, directives, and commands, asking controlling questions, and using deadline statements are also behaviours associated with an excessively teacher-centred agenda and have been shown to Flink, Boggiano, & Barrett, 1990).…”
Section: (2) Controlling Feedbacksupporting
confidence: 57%
“…For example, mothers' constraining verbal expressions and pressuring language have been negatively related to children's intrinsic motivation (Deci, Driver, Hotchkiss, Robbins, & McDougal-Wilson, 1993). Similar findings have also been reported in the educational setting in which controlling teachers also tend to stress personal control, prevent children from expressing opinions which differ from their own, and use controlling vocalisations (Assor, Kaplan, Kanat-Maymon, & Roth, 2005;Reeve & Jang 2006). Not letting children work at their own pace, monopolising the conversation, using orders, directives, and commands, asking controlling questions, and using deadline statements are also behaviours associated with an excessively teacher-centred agenda and have been shown to Flink, Boggiano, & Barrett, 1990).…”
Section: (2) Controlling Feedbacksupporting
confidence: 57%
“…These findings are broadly consistent with those from adjacent areas of the educational psychology literature. For example, the use of threats, deadlines, pressured evaluations, and imposed goals (see Ryan & Deci, 2000;Reeve, 2009) are associated with reduced engagement and increased learning-related anger and anxiety (Assor & Kaplan, 2001;Assor, Kaplan, Kanat-Maymon & Roth, 2005). Coercive practices that threaten students with punishment and guilt are associated with a decrease in positive learning-related affect, motivation, and cognitive learning (Mainhard, Brenkelmans, & Wubbels, 2011).…”
Section: Fear Appeals In the Classroommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to previous research, this study also separates intrinsic (here "internal") motivation as a long-lasting one from the short-termed extrinsic (here "external") motivation when this is needed (Ryan, 1995;Niemiec & Ryan, 2009;also Ryan & Deci, 2009). Various studies have shown positive relationships between motivation and learning achievement (Choosri & Intharaksa, 2011;Dweck, 2002;Hagger et al, 2015;Jang, Kim, & Reeve, 2012;Loima & Vibulphol, 2014;Yunus, Suraya, & Wan-Ali, 2009) and variables related to learning such as autonomy (Ling, 2013) and engagement (Assor, Kaplan, & Roth, 2002;Assor, Kaplan, Kanat-Maymon, & Roth 2005;Jang, Kim, & Reeve, 2012;De Witte & Rogge, 2013;Jang, Reeve, & Deci, 2010;Skinner, Chi, & the Learning-Gardens Educational Assessment Group, 2012). Furthermore, the data analysis applied reflections on motivation from the self-determination theory (SDT) presented by Niemiec and Ryan (2009).…”
Section: Introduction: Objectives Data and Importance Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%