2000
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Direkte Autotransfusionssysteme liefern Blut unzureichender Qualität

Abstract: The systems/filters assessed in this study do not improve quality of blood drained from the surgical field. Retransfusion of such blood can not be recommended.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The proponents of ADR, however, claim that unwanted substances are sufficiently removed by a filter system. We assessed three filter systems with regard to handling and effectiveness in patients undergoing total knee replacement [13]. Wound blood was examined before passage of the filter system and after passage of the ADR system.…”
Section: Quality Of the Blood Salvaged With Autologous Direct Transfumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proponents of ADR, however, claim that unwanted substances are sufficiently removed by a filter system. We assessed three filter systems with regard to handling and effectiveness in patients undergoing total knee replacement [13]. Wound blood was examined before passage of the filter system and after passage of the ADR system.…”
Section: Quality Of the Blood Salvaged With Autologous Direct Transfumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After transfusion of only 450 ml drainage blood -less than 10% of the blood volume -an increase of *Blood loss < 300 ml / 4 h. **Blood loss 300-1,000 ml / 4 h. Table 4. Comparison of drainage blood before and after filtration with three ADR systems [13] fibrin degradation products was observed up to 5 days after ADR. The D-dimer concentration was still increased 24 h after re-transfusion of the wound blood, indicating severe and sustained derangement of the hemostatic system (table 5).…”
Section: Effects Of the Re-transfusion Of Wound And Drainage Blood Onmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unwashed wound or drainage blood cannot meet modern quality criteria in transfusion medicine because of its content of unfavorable substances originating from cytolysis and activation processes, and its content of destroyed and activated cells. -Quality of this blood is variable and usually bad [3]. -Contamination with unfavorable substances, i.e.…”
Section: Retransfusion Of Unwashed Wound and Drainage Bloodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die meisten Autoren bewerten die Relevanz der Erythrozytenzerstörung als gering. Diese Einschätzung ist jedoch nicht ohne Widerspruch geblieben [28]. Als Risikofaktor wird insbesondere immer wieder die potentiell nephrotoxische Wirkung des freien Hämoglobins aufgeführt, wobei die klinische Relevanz jedoch ungeklärt ist.…”
Section: Eigenschaften Von Drainageblutunclassified
“…Letztendlich ist jedoch die klinische Bedeutung der gefundenen Ergebnisse nicht klar. Wenn auch die große Verbreitung und mittlerweile langjährige erfolgreiche Anwendung für die direkte Drainageblutretransfusion sprechen, gibt es in der neueren Literatur noch immer Arbeiten, in denen dieses Verfahren grundsätzlich abgelehnt wird [28]. Einige Autoren empfehlen daher Wundblut vor der Retransfusion zu waschen, wie es auch üb-licherweise bei der intraoperativen Sammlung von Wundblut mit maschinellen Autotransfusionssystemen durchgeführt wird.…”
Section: Nebenwirkungen Durch Drainageblutretransfusionunclassified