2018
DOI: 10.3102/0091732x18759041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disability Critical Race Theory: Exploring the Intersectional Lineage, Emergence, and Potential Futures of DisCrit in Education

Abstract: In this review, we explore how intersectionality has been engaged with through the lens of disability critical race theory (DisCrit) to produce new knowledge. In this chapter, we (1) trace the intellectual lineage for developing DisCrit, (2) review the body of interdisciplinary scholarship incorporating DisCrit to date, and (3) propose the future trajectories of DisCrit, noting challenges and tensions that have arisen. Providing new opportunities to investigate how patterns of oppression uniquely intersect to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DisCrit challenges constructions of both Whiteness and ability as "the normative cultural standards" (Annamma et al, 2013, p. 12) against which difference becomes deficit. The framework builds upon a limited, but significant, genealogy of scholarship that has mapped the ways racism and ableism intersect; particularly how ableist logics and rhetoric are used to justify the marginalization of people of color (Annamma et al, 2018;Bell, 2011). DisCrit purposefully weaves together Disability Studies and Critical Race Theory (CRT) as theoretical frameworks that have independently critiqued racism and ableism as endemic to society, but which have historically resisted "joint thinking" around racism and ableism as "interconnected and collusive" (Annamma et al, 2013, p. 6).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DisCrit challenges constructions of both Whiteness and ability as "the normative cultural standards" (Annamma et al, 2013, p. 12) against which difference becomes deficit. The framework builds upon a limited, but significant, genealogy of scholarship that has mapped the ways racism and ableism intersect; particularly how ableist logics and rhetoric are used to justify the marginalization of people of color (Annamma et al, 2018;Bell, 2011). DisCrit purposefully weaves together Disability Studies and Critical Race Theory (CRT) as theoretical frameworks that have independently critiqued racism and ableism as endemic to society, but which have historically resisted "joint thinking" around racism and ableism as "interconnected and collusive" (Annamma et al, 2013, p. 6).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, other participants developed advocacy strategies in response to challenges in their home environment. For example, Sam's family fought to keep him in a mainstream classroom after his K-12 school misdiagnosed him, concerned that his being in a segregated, special education would make him more vulnerable to forms of school discipline leading to incarceration (Annamma et al, 2018). As Sam entered college and sought an accurate diagnosis for accommodations, he developed "a dual advocacy" across academic and family spaces -the latter involving "being able to combat sometimes your own family who might not understand a lot of what you're going through.…”
Section: Learning About Self-advocacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students like John, who are both a person of color and a person with a disability, face even more complex cultural oppression. Annamma, Ferri, and Connor (2018) have developed disability critical race theory (DisCrit) to better evaluate the societal pressures placed on individuals like John. Annamma and colleagues (2018) believe these individuals experience "patterns of oppression [that] uniquely intersect to target students at the margins of Whiteness and ability" (p. 46).…”
Section: Race and Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5. Read the Annamma et al's (2018) article. Using the article, create talking points to discuss how IHEs might collaborate with majority-minority high schools to create enabling environments for students with disabilities who are culturally diverse.…”
Section: Additional Activitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing from these theories, I build a methodological framework, which I refer to as a Feminist DisCrit (FDC) approach to teaching collaboration in TPC. While this kind of approach has been used in other disciplinary areas, it has yet to be explicitly utilized in TPC research and pedagogical frameworks (Annamma, Ferri, & Connor, 2018;Banks, 2018;Weiss, 2015). In the final portion, I give an overview of the chapters that follow.…”
Section: Critical Race Theory 13mentioning
confidence: 99%