2016
DOI: 10.1002/mds.26649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disability Rating Scales in Parkinson's Disease: Critique and Recommendations

Abstract: Many disability measures are available and recommended for application in PD. The Task Force does not recommend the development of a new scale. Selection of the most appropriate instrument for a particular objective requires consideration of the characteristics of each scale and the goals of the assessment. © 2016 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
53
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The first part of Part I and Parts III and IV are evaluated by physicians, whereas the second part of Part I and the whole Part II are self-administered by patients. MDS-UPDRS can be used for different applications, but in some pharmacogenetic studies, where the efficacy of dopaminergic drugs is evaluated in association with genetic factors, the main efficacy criterion is a difference in MDS-UPDRS score over a particular period of time [16,[23][24][25][26]]. …”
Section: Treatment Efficacy Evaluation With the Mds-unified Parkinsonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first part of Part I and Parts III and IV are evaluated by physicians, whereas the second part of Part I and the whole Part II are self-administered by patients. MDS-UPDRS can be used for different applications, but in some pharmacogenetic studies, where the efficacy of dopaminergic drugs is evaluated in association with genetic factors, the main efficacy criterion is a difference in MDS-UPDRS score over a particular period of time [16,[23][24][25][26]]. …”
Section: Treatment Efficacy Evaluation With the Mds-unified Parkinsonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Timed Up and Go test (TUG) is one that can be applied in PD population [21]. TUG has been used to assess patients with moderate to severe PD [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have revealed that instrumented TUG (iTUG) can provide more information comparing to measures taken by a classical TUG [15,21,22]. A major part of this research includes use of different types of camera based assessment tools for instrumental motion analysis [4,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment can be based on observations of actual ADL performance, interviews, or self-ratings. Assessments can address difficulties in performing ADL, dependence on assistance from others and from assistive devices, or a combination of both [3]. Several ADL rating scales have been psychometrically tested and recommended for use with people with PD [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessments can address difficulties in performing ADL, dependence on assistance from others and from assistive devices, or a combination of both [3]. Several ADL rating scales have been psychometrically tested and recommended for use with people with PD [3]. These rating scales typically include around ten items and have been shown to be highly associated with walking difficulties ( r s 0.74–0.86) [4] and physical functioning ( r 0.63–0.77) [5, 6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%