1996
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199612150-00025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disability Resulting From Occupational Low Back Pain

Abstract: This is the second of two papers that systematically review available scientific evidence on the causes of disability from occupational low back pain, and the effectiveness of interventions to prevent it after its onset (secondary prevention). This paper reviews the national history of how back pain and the risk factors for its extension into chronic disability, followed by a critical summary of intervention studies attempting to reduce the duration of this disability, and to evaluate the results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 372 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence favours supervised, graduated and early return to work for improving role functioning among patients with chronic symptoms and disability. For example, studies of patients with low back pain suggest that a return to modified work can be successful (Frank et al 1996), while work restrictions diminish the likelihood of return to work and do not reduce absenteeism or back pain recurrences (Burton & Erg 1997). …”
Section: (D) Intensive Rehabilitative Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence favours supervised, graduated and early return to work for improving role functioning among patients with chronic symptoms and disability. For example, studies of patients with low back pain suggest that a return to modified work can be successful (Frank et al 1996), while work restrictions diminish the likelihood of return to work and do not reduce absenteeism or back pain recurrences (Burton & Erg 1997). …”
Section: (D) Intensive Rehabilitative Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In Germany, about 14% of the days lost from work are due to back disorders 1. Some trades are characterised by a comparatively high prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders with the construction industry ranking third for sickness absence due to LBP in Germany 1…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most knowledge on risk factors of LBP stems from cross sectional studies which cannot evaluate the temporal sequence between a risk factor and the occurrence of pain 7. Three different groups of potential risk factors have been identified2 7: ( a ) individual factors such as body weight and age, ( b ) biomechanical factors such as heavy physical load, lifting, twisted postures, and vibration, and ( c ) psychosocial factors such as job control and job satisfaction. The increased risk for bricklayers has been attributed to inclined work postures and by repetitive lifting of bricks which weigh 5–24 kg, depending on the type and size 5…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…† 15,22,23 The severity measures include back and leg pain intensity (NRS-101), functional disability (Roland-Morris scale), and health-related quality of life (mental and physical components of the Short Form-12). ‡ 24 -26 Each of these standard measures represents a slightly different expression of the severity of back pain although there are substantial overlaps among them.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%