2016
DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2016.1208603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disability studies after the ontological turn: a return to the material world and material bodies without a return to essentialism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
86
0
12

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
86
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Other scholars have disentangled disability as coming into existence by barriers and attitudes created by the society. As Feely (2016) outlines, work in this tradition tends to leave the body unquestioned (more specifically, the body is regarded as impaired), while the focus is on disability as a social construction. Another way of exploring the relations between the body and disability is found among scholars inspired by poststructuralism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other scholars have disentangled disability as coming into existence by barriers and attitudes created by the society. As Feely (2016) outlines, work in this tradition tends to leave the body unquestioned (more specifically, the body is regarded as impaired), while the focus is on disability as a social construction. Another way of exploring the relations between the body and disability is found among scholars inspired by poststructuralism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another way of exploring the relations between the body and disability is found among scholars inspired by poststructuralism. They regard the body and disability as social constructions while discourses and language are sources of inspirations for their understanding (Feely 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical realists such as Shakespeare (2014) and Vehmas and Watson (2014) lambast poststructuralist leanings within critical disability studies for ignoring the stark realities of impairment. However, for Feely (2016), the self-defined 'critical realism' of these scholars actually lacks criticality because it imports simplistic essentialist ideas of impairment and the body. These interventions, he suggests, lack a more nuanced and dynamic engagement with the materiality of life.…”
Section: Disability and Resistant Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interventions, he suggests, lack a more nuanced and dynamic engagement with the materiality of life. For Feely (2016) such an engagement is offered through bringing in the work of Deleuze and Guattari (for example, Deleuze and Guattari 1987) and to this we would add Deleuzian scholars, in particular the work of Braidotti (for example, Braidotti 2003Braidotti , 2013. In Feely's (2016) beautifully accessible piece he notes that for Deleuze reality is made up of discursive statements and material entities.…”
Section: Disability and Resistant Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation