2016
DOI: 10.1108/ijpsm-03-2015-0041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disabled employees in Jordanian public sector: an exploratory study

Abstract: Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the attitudes of disabled employees toward availability of work facilities, treatment of other employees, and the working conditions in the Jordanian public sector. Design/methodology/approach – A purposive sample of disabled public sector employees (198) was selected to participate in the study by filling the designated questionnaire. Findings … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Usually in Jordan is the employment of persons with disabilities on the humanitarian cases because of disability, or according to a quota system or to the qualifications. Ababneh (2016 [34]) found in his study which conducted in Jordan on (198) employee with a disability in the public sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually in Jordan is the employment of persons with disabilities on the humanitarian cases because of disability, or according to a quota system or to the qualifications. Ababneh (2016 [34]) found in his study which conducted in Jordan on (198) employee with a disability in the public sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, our research extends the research stream on well-being among employees with disabilities to the public context. In comparison with research on disability management in the private sector (Cavanagh et al, 2017), well-being among public employees with disabilities has remained an under-explored area of research (Ababneh, 2016; Kausto et al, 2017; Riccucci, 2018) regardless of its salience in advancing our understanding of how to manage a diverse workforce in the public sector to improve public services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was the use of standard scales spanning 5 points, ranging from 5 (strongly agree) to 1 (strongly disagree). As noted by Ababneh (2016), satisfaction was determined across three levels in analysing the assessment of subjects towards each aspect, with the levels detailed as high, moderate, and low. In mind of the maximum point of satisfaction measured in the questionnaire totalling 5, this number was then divided by 3 (i.e., the different levels of satisfaction) in an effort to determine the mean value.…”
Section: Sample and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%