2018
DOI: 10.1080/13569775.2018.1471645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disabling dissent: the colour revolutions, autocratic linkages, and civil society regulations in hybrid regimes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While previous large-scale grassroots campaigns capitalized on their global media exposure, this dissent occurring at the 'periphery of media flow' in society largely marginalized and excluded from the transnational agenda was unable to utilise the global media exposure to (re)gain momentum. The findings are also useful for the policymakers and NGO practitioners, as they clarify the role of distinct post-Soviet settings in disabling (Gilbert and Mohseni, 2018) citizens' collective action.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…While previous large-scale grassroots campaigns capitalized on their global media exposure, this dissent occurring at the 'periphery of media flow' in society largely marginalized and excluded from the transnational agenda was unable to utilise the global media exposure to (re)gain momentum. The findings are also useful for the policymakers and NGO practitioners, as they clarify the role of distinct post-Soviet settings in disabling (Gilbert and Mohseni, 2018) citizens' collective action.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Perhaps, it is only when the quality of engagement with civil society is improved that the positive effect, that is reduction of political corruption, of CSO consultation transpires. Moreover, several scholars have warned of the effect of current trends toward democratic recession such as the squeezing of civic space (Buyse, 2018) and on how state elites have increasingly used the NGO legal environment as a ruling strategy to disable dissent (Dupuy et al, 2015;Gilbert & Mohseni, 2018) on the vibrance of civil society and by extension, its contribution to the enhancement of democracy and governance. However, it is puzzling but very important to note yet again that as found out in this study, similar to CSO consultation but unlike CSO repression, CSO entry and exit, defined here as the extent to which the government achieves control over the entry and exit of CSOs into public life, did not lead to a reduction in political corruption as the regression models provide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, authoritarian regimes can repress organizations that communicate political problems trough legal or administrative measures (Dupuy et al, 2016;Rutzen, 2015). Documented practices include mandating government oversight of civil society groups, placing prohibitive administrative burdens on protest events, relocating protest activities to remote areas where press coverage is unlikely, and requiring civil society organizations to seek government approval before publishing information (Gilbert & Mohseni, 2018;Kriesi, 2006, p. 86;Lang, 2014, pp. 98-108).…”
Section: Civil Liberties Safeguard Messengers Of Inconvenient Truthsmentioning
confidence: 99%