1997
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-947x(1997)123:1(36)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disaggregate Gap-Acceptance Model for Unsignalized T-Intersections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Research by Xiaoming et al (2007) identified wait time and the length of queue on the minor approach as factors affecting gap acceptance behavior, with wait time being the most influential. Similarly, Hamed et al (1997) found that the expected wait time increases as the length of available gaps decreases. They also found that gap acceptance behavior is not uniform throughout the day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Research by Xiaoming et al (2007) identified wait time and the length of queue on the minor approach as factors affecting gap acceptance behavior, with wait time being the most influential. Similarly, Hamed et al (1997) found that the expected wait time increases as the length of available gaps decreases. They also found that gap acceptance behavior is not uniform throughout the day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Hamed et al (1997) studied left turn maneuvers at stop-controlled T-intersections and found that the presence of a median with an exclusive left-turn lane on the major approach resulted in smaller critical gaps. According to the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000, the presence of a storage area on the major road that is wide enough to accommodate left turning vehicles, allows for two-stage gap acceptance, resulting in the entire left turn maneuver being considered as two separate stop controlled maneuvers.…”
Section: Gap Acceptance/critical Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In early 1980's, researchers developed gap acceptance models by comparing existing methods of critical gap estimation and obtained satisfactory results using Ashworth method (Miller, 1972) and maximum likelihood technique (Miller, 1972;1974). Later, binary logit model was developed (Hamed et al, 1997) to determine the drivers gap acceptance probabilities. The probabilities of accepting or rejecting a gap for each driver can be determined using a binary probit model which is used in the calculation of critical gap for all the drivers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works can be found such as ones from Devarasetty et al 8) and Harwood et al 9) which used logistic regression to model gap acceptance for left-turning passenger cars from major roads at un-signalized intersections. Also, there were an attempt to include the characteristics of drivers (such as socioeconomic characteristics and driver attitudes−risk loving and cautious) into the model such as the works from Hamed et al 10) and Pollatschek et al 11) . On the other hand, Gattis and Low 12) developed a logit gap model and found that drivers who involved in conflicts were too comfortable with short gaps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%