2011
DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2011.559202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disaggregate-level estimates of indebtedness in the state of Uttar Pradesh in India: an application of small-area estimation technique

Abstract: The National Sample Survey Organisation (NSSO) surveys are the main source of official statistics in India and generate a range of invaluable data at the macro level (e.g. state and national level). However, the NSSO data cannot be used directly to produce reliable estimates at the micro level (e.g. district or further disaggregate level) due to small sample sizes. There is a rapidly growing demand of such micro level statistics in India as the country is moving from centralized to more decentralized planning … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
66
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, we present the methodological framework used to derive local or small area estimates of the prevalence and dynamics of disadvantage based on the area‐level version of the generalised linear mixed model with logit link function (i.e. logistic‐normal mixed model), suitable for modelling discrete data, specifically through the binomial distribution (Chandra et al , ; Chandra et al , ; Amoako Johnson et al , ). This provides reliable model‐based estimates at the regional level and their standard errors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this reason, we present the methodological framework used to derive local or small area estimates of the prevalence and dynamics of disadvantage based on the area‐level version of the generalised linear mixed model with logit link function (i.e. logistic‐normal mixed model), suitable for modelling discrete data, specifically through the binomial distribution (Chandra et al , ; Chandra et al , ; Amoako Johnson et al , ). This provides reliable model‐based estimates at the regional level and their standard errors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These estimates are computed to assess the reliability of the small area estimates and also to construct confidence intervals for the small area parameters of interest. Following Rao and Molina (, Chapter 5), Saei and Chambers (2003) and Chandra et al (), the MSE estimate of under model is given by mse()truep^rEP=M1()trueσ^u2+M2()trueσ^u2+2M3false(trueσ^u2false). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimates of fixed effect parameter boldλ̂ and random effects âi are obtained by an iterative procedure that combines the PQL estimation of λ and a=(a1,,aD)T with restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation of σa2 (see Chandra et al., ; Johnson, Chandra, Brown, & Padmadas, ; and references therein for further details). The direct estimate of proportions and area‐level auxiliary variables (trueX¯i0.28em;i=1,,Dfalse) can also be modeled by Fay and Herriot () model and then the EBLUP of small area proportions (i.e., EBLUP.FH) can be obtained.…”
Section: Small Area Estimation For Proportionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider two commonly used measures namely the percent coefficient of variation (CV) and the 95% CIs for small area estimates diagnostics (Chandra et al., 2011; Johnson et al., ). We compute the percent CV to assess the improved precision of the EPP1 estimates compared to the DIR estimates.…”
Section: Application To Real Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation