2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-013-9256-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disaggregating operating and financial activities: implications for forecasts of profitability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is argued that profitability driven by operating activities has a stronger association with stock returns than the profitability driven by financing activities [45]. In addition, the operating/financing disaggregation can improve the forecasts of profitability when the components forecasting approach is used, but this disaggregation yields less accurate forecasts than the unusual/infrequent disaggregation [46].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is argued that profitability driven by operating activities has a stronger association with stock returns than the profitability driven by financing activities [45]. In addition, the operating/financing disaggregation can improve the forecasts of profitability when the components forecasting approach is used, but this disaggregation yields less accurate forecasts than the unusual/infrequent disaggregation [46].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to FirmEFF and ManagerEFF, another efficiency measure used in this paper is the industry-adjusted asset turnover (AssetEFF), computed as sales (SALE) to NOA to measure operating-asset efficiency. Deflating SALE by NOA instead of total assets (AT) helps us focus on the operating activities that mainly drive firm value, instead of the financing activities (Nissim and Penman, 2001;Esplin et al, 2014). The industry adjustment extracts firm-specific skills, which is critical because asset turnover is largely a function of industry membership (Soliman, 2004).…”
Section: Efficiency Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dichos valores extremos surgen por el efecto adverso ocasionado por denominadores reducidos (Esplin et al, 2014) dado que las empresas objeto de estudio se caracterizan por su reducida dimensión. Con respecto a las correlaciones existentes entre las variables empleadas en el análisis empírico, tras la eliminación de las observaciones extremas revelan una correlación positiva y débil entre las mismas (Tabla 4).…”
Section: Indicadores De Performance Financiera Y Variables Explicativasunclassified