2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3515685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disagreement About Fundamentals: Measurement and Consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 54 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When 2 The empirical evidence in Banerjee (2011) suggests that the extent to which investors condition on prices varies substantially across stocks. More recent evidence suggests that both disagreement (e.g., Andrade et al (2016), Fischer, Kim, and Zhou (2020)) and overconfidence (e.g., Merkle (2017)) vary over time. 3 We follow Bénabou and Tirole (2016) and use the term "anticipatory utility" to refer to the contemporaneous utility that an individual derives from the anticipation of future outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When 2 The empirical evidence in Banerjee (2011) suggests that the extent to which investors condition on prices varies substantially across stocks. More recent evidence suggests that both disagreement (e.g., Andrade et al (2016), Fischer, Kim, and Zhou (2020)) and overconfidence (e.g., Merkle (2017)) vary over time. 3 We follow Bénabou and Tirole (2016) and use the term "anticipatory utility" to refer to the contemporaneous utility that an individual derives from the anticipation of future outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%