2022
DOI: 10.1111/fire.12308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disagreement between hedge funds and other institutional investors and the cross‐section of expected stock returns

Abstract: We find strong disagreements between hedge funds and other institutions in their common stock trades are twice as likely as agreements. Overall success of hedge funds’ trades and poor performance of non‐hedge funds’ trades are both confined to disagreement stocks. Although hedge funds are commonly positive feedback traders, they are neither positive nor negative feedback traders for stocks heavily sold by other institutions. Hedge funds also depend less on earnings news. Our findings highlight the importance o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar argument can also be drawn from the strand of literature concerning the value-adding market-timing and stock-picking capabilities of fund managers (Alda, 2018;Baker et al, 2010;Bangassa, Su and Joseph, 2012;Feng and Johanson, 2015;Hentati-Kaffel and de Peretti, 2015;Osinga, Schauten and Zwinkels, 2021), although Kosowski et al (2006) and Yi and He (2016) are sceptical as to whether Chinese fund managers have indeed such capabilities. Likewise, Caglayan, Celiker and Sonaer (2022) document twice as many disagreements than agreements between hedge funds and other institutions in their common stock trades, suggesting differences in fund managers' skills and their responsiveness to public information; and Kacperczyk and Seru (2007) find that the responsiveness of a fund manager's portfolio allocations to changes in public information are negatively related to the manager's skill. Therefore, fund manager changes are likely to entail substantial changes in the features of the fund.…”
Section: The Importance Of a Fund Manager For The Characteristics Of ...mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar argument can also be drawn from the strand of literature concerning the value-adding market-timing and stock-picking capabilities of fund managers (Alda, 2018;Baker et al, 2010;Bangassa, Su and Joseph, 2012;Feng and Johanson, 2015;Hentati-Kaffel and de Peretti, 2015;Osinga, Schauten and Zwinkels, 2021), although Kosowski et al (2006) and Yi and He (2016) are sceptical as to whether Chinese fund managers have indeed such capabilities. Likewise, Caglayan, Celiker and Sonaer (2022) document twice as many disagreements than agreements between hedge funds and other institutions in their common stock trades, suggesting differences in fund managers' skills and their responsiveness to public information; and Kacperczyk and Seru (2007) find that the responsiveness of a fund manager's portfolio allocations to changes in public information are negatively related to the manager's skill. Therefore, fund manager changes are likely to entail substantial changes in the features of the fund.…”
Section: The Importance Of a Fund Manager For The Characteristics Of ...mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(2006) and Yi and He (2016) are sceptical as to whether Chinese fund managers have indeed such capabilities. Likewise, Caglayan, Celiker and Sonaer (2022) document twice as many disagreements than agreements between hedge funds and other institutions in their common stock trades, suggesting differences in fund managers’ skills and their responsiveness to public information; and Kacperczyk and Seru (2007) find that the responsiveness of a fund manager's portfolio allocations to changes in public information are negatively related to the manager's skill. Therefore, fund manager changes are likely to entail substantial changes in the features of the fund.…”
Section: Theoretical Underpinnings and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%