2021
DOI: 10.1002/mde.3356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disappointment aversion in tournaments

Abstract: Many experiments and field studies indicate that individuals have an asymmetric attitude towards gains versus losses. In this paper, we extend the canonic tournament model by assuming the workers' preferences exhibit disappointment aversion. First, we find the winning prize is first increasing and then decreasing in volatility and the losing prize shows the opposite. Furthermore, when the volatility exceeds a threshold, both the winning and losing prizes are reduced to zero. By contrast, there is no such kink … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A critical feature of our model is that customers make a purchase decision by ex ante maximizing their expected utility, which includes both the monetary payoff and psychological disappointment (elation) payoff. Disappointment has been modeled in several studies, for example, Bell (1985), Inman et al (1997), Delquié and Cillo (2006), Liu and Shum (2013), Du et al (2019), and Wu (2021). However, the disappointment in service failure has not been modeled in either operation management or marketing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical feature of our model is that customers make a purchase decision by ex ante maximizing their expected utility, which includes both the monetary payoff and psychological disappointment (elation) payoff. Disappointment has been modeled in several studies, for example, Bell (1985), Inman et al (1997), Delquié and Cillo (2006), Liu and Shum (2013), Du et al (2019), and Wu (2021). However, the disappointment in service failure has not been modeled in either operation management or marketing.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%