2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2006.00434.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disarming the paradox of sublethal plant defense against insects: Trirhabda virgata larval development time and leaf tissue loss on Solidago altissima

Abstract: Although the fitness benefits of traits that kill herbivores are obvious, the contention that sublethal antiperformance traits have evolved as plant defenses has proved more controversial. Traits that slow herbivore development seem particularly paradoxical, given the common assumption that a protracted feeding period will lead to greater total consumption. Whereas this assumption is superficially reasonable, there is very little evolutionarily relevant evidence to suggest that plants on which larval developme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(80 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, although not mutually exclusively, exposure and damage may induce distinct resistance phenotypes that differentially affect T. virgata's performance and behaviour (Bode, Halitschke & Kessler 2013;Uesugi, Poelman & Kessler 2013)for instance, while both resistance phenotypes may repel T. virgata, they may vary in the amount of toxins or antidigestive resistance compounds they contain. Our herbivore movement and performance data generally seem to support this hypothesis and are consistent with a study showing that 'sublethal' plant defences in S. altissima differentially affect T. virgata's feeding and growth rate (Wise, Fox & Abrahamson 2006). The distinct induction patterns for secondary metabolite production discussed above further support this hypothesis.…”
Section: P L a N T C O M M U N I C A T I O N I N C R E A S E S H E R supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Alternatively, although not mutually exclusively, exposure and damage may induce distinct resistance phenotypes that differentially affect T. virgata's performance and behaviour (Bode, Halitschke & Kessler 2013;Uesugi, Poelman & Kessler 2013)for instance, while both resistance phenotypes may repel T. virgata, they may vary in the amount of toxins or antidigestive resistance compounds they contain. Our herbivore movement and performance data generally seem to support this hypothesis and are consistent with a study showing that 'sublethal' plant defences in S. altissima differentially affect T. virgata's feeding and growth rate (Wise, Fox & Abrahamson 2006). The distinct induction patterns for secondary metabolite production discussed above further support this hypothesis.…”
Section: P L a N T C O M M U N I C A T I O N I N C R E A S E S H E R supporting
confidence: 90%
“…An interpretation of the observed differences between host plant species requires some caution because plants used in this experiment represent only a small genotypic variation (if any) within a species, and different plant genotypes are likely to differ in mode of resistance against herbivores (Gols et al, 2008). Further demonstrations of SGHM in relation to plant nutritional quality using plant genotypes that vary in primary, as well as secondary metabolites, could provide new insights into the evolution of low plant quality as mechanisms of direct and indirect plant defences (Wise et al, 2006).…”
Section: Plant Nutritional Quality and Plant Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slow-growth high-mortality (SGHM) hypothesis posits that prolonged larval stages among insect herbivores will extend exposure to, and mortality from, their natural enemies (Moran & Hamilton, 1980;Clancy & Price, 1987). This hypothesis has critical implications for the paradoxical evolution of sublethal toxins and low digestibility in plants, which merely retards herbivore growth, thus potentially causing greater tissue loss on plants (Feeny, 1976;Price et al, 1980; but see Wise et al, 2006). Although studies of plant-herbivore interactions often assume the action of SGHM, empirical support for the hypothesis has been equivocal (reviewed in Williams, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lethal effects often occur at higher metal concentrations than sublethal effects, and their defensive value may be greater because they can severely impact herbivore populations (Boyd 2012). However, sublethal effects of elemental sequestration may be evolutionarily effective in some cases (Price et al 1980;Boyd and Moar 1999;Wise et al 2006). Determination of both lethal and sublethal levels of elements may provide information helpful to studies of elemental plant defense.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%