Disassembling the City: A Historical and an Epistemological View on the Agency of Cities

Abstract

Current ideas about the “agency” of cities are dominated by economists and economic geographers who point to agglomeration economies and the clustering of institutions, if not to “creative classes” and a tolerant and diverse cultural climate. In this article, such views will be historized and denaturalized. It will be examined how “urban agency” was fabricated in the late medieval and early modern period, stressing the role of political philosophy and epistemology. First, focusing on guilds and artisanal economic actors, I will describe the coemergence of specific types of skills and knowledge and the urban as a community and body politic. Subsequently, I will argue that the city as an “assemblage” transformed drastically during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, showing that the transformations concerning both the political and economic identity of guild-based artisans and the city as a specific political community were contingent on specific attitudes and practices related to matter and materiality.

Commons and the nature of modernity: towards a cosmopolitical view on craft guilds

“…In the fourth and last section, I will then launch a reflection on a new way to write the history of the guilds, one in which the issue of modernization is tackled while anachronism is nevertheless avoided. To that end, I will build on earlier work in which I have used Actor-Network Theory (ANT) ( , 2017a, which proceeds from a radical refusal to take such modern concepts and analytical categories as capital, class, state, individual and structure for granted (for a general introduction, see Latour 2005). Rather than applying these concepts as explanatory or even descriptive categories, ANT invites to examine the processes by which they come into being.…”