2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0cc03257c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disassembly of polymeric nanoparticles with enzyme-triggered polymer unzipping: polyelectrolyte complexes vs. amphiphilic nanoassemblies

Abstract: Enzyme-induced chain unzipping is shown to cause nanoparticle disassembly. The self-assembly and triggered disassembly are evaluated in two different formats.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that DDS should be, on one hand, extremely stable to withstand the high dilution and interactions with blood components in order to allow their circulation in the body while maintaining their cargo of active drug molecules . On the other hand, the carriers should be able to release the drugs when the DDS has reached the target site. To address this need, over the last three decades, there has been a great interest in utilizing stimuli-responsive polymeric micelles as DDS to allow selective release of their therapeutic cargo. , There are many reported examples of polymeric micelles that disassemble due to changes in pH, temperature, or redox potential, while there are significantly fewer examples of polymeric nanocarriers that can disassemble due to the presence of a designated enzyme. Enzymes are very appealing for triggering the disassembly of drug containing micelles since they are already present in the body, known for their high substrate specificity and in many cases specific enzymes are overexpressed in diseased tissues. Polymeric micelles are typically formed by the self-assembly of amphiphilic diblock copolymers so that the hydrophobic block forms the core and the hydrophilic block forms the micellar corona. It is clear that in the biological environment, most of the interactions between the micelle and its surroundings occur through the micelle’s corona. , It is interesting to note that although most reported DDS are based on poly­(ethylene glycol) (PEG), , the use of additional types of promising hydrophilic polymers such as poly­(2-oxazoline)­s and polyacrylates has also been reported, inspired by the increasing human population that carries anti-PEG antibodies leading to an immune-response upon treatment with PEG-based therapeutics. , To allow the rational design of DDS, it is critical to compare and study the behavior of different corona forming polymers in order to rationally select the most suited hydrophilic block .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that DDS should be, on one hand, extremely stable to withstand the high dilution and interactions with blood components in order to allow their circulation in the body while maintaining their cargo of active drug molecules . On the other hand, the carriers should be able to release the drugs when the DDS has reached the target site. To address this need, over the last three decades, there has been a great interest in utilizing stimuli-responsive polymeric micelles as DDS to allow selective release of their therapeutic cargo. , There are many reported examples of polymeric micelles that disassemble due to changes in pH, temperature, or redox potential, while there are significantly fewer examples of polymeric nanocarriers that can disassemble due to the presence of a designated enzyme. Enzymes are very appealing for triggering the disassembly of drug containing micelles since they are already present in the body, known for their high substrate specificity and in many cases specific enzymes are overexpressed in diseased tissues. Polymeric micelles are typically formed by the self-assembly of amphiphilic diblock copolymers so that the hydrophobic block forms the core and the hydrophilic block forms the micellar corona. It is clear that in the biological environment, most of the interactions between the micelle and its surroundings occur through the micelle’s corona. , It is interesting to note that although most reported DDS are based on poly­(ethylene glycol) (PEG), , the use of additional types of promising hydrophilic polymers such as poly­(2-oxazoline)­s and polyacrylates has also been reported, inspired by the increasing human population that carries anti-PEG antibodies leading to an immune-response upon treatment with PEG-based therapeutics. , To allow the rational design of DDS, it is critical to compare and study the behavior of different corona forming polymers in order to rationally select the most suited hydrophilic block .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(B) Proposed schematic of particle formulation using P2 and its triggered disassembly in response to ALP. Reproduced with permission from ref ( 77 ). Copyright 2020 Royal Society of Chemistry.…”
Section: Overcoming the Stability-responsiveness Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very different approach was very recently reported by Thayumanavan and co-workers that utilized an elegant molecular design that allows the translation of an enzymatic cleavage on the surface of polymeric assemblies into complete degradation of the assembled structures (Figure ). The design is based on the use of self-immolative polymer as the hydrophilic block. As in previous reports by Shabat, Moore, Gillies, and others, the Thayumanavan group took advantage of the ability of the self-immolative polymers to undergo controlled self-degradation upon cleavage of its head group.…”
Section: Overcoming the Stability-responsiveness Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, designing controllable responsive polymeric vesicles for overexpressed enzymes has applications in many fields, such as diagnostics, drug delivery, and sensing. Kumar et al designed an enzyme-responsive polymersome which cleaves with phosphatase (ALP) at the phosphate end of the polymer [11]. The study divided ALP into three types: ALP-responsive polysome P0, and hydrophilic modification into it forms P1 and hydrophobic modification into it forms P2.…”
Section: Enzyme-responsive Polymersomesmentioning
confidence: 99%