2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disaster policy and emergency management reforms in China: From Wenchuan earthquake to Jiuzhaigou earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zhang and Kong (2022) held the same view and proposed that CG can improve the ability of participants to take change actions and improve their adaptability to complex disaster events. Bakkour et al (2015) and Hu et al (2021) studied the case of 2010 mount Merapi uplift in Indonesia and the Wenchuan earthquake in 2008, respectively. They all concluded that large-scale crisis events require better coordination and greater institutional flexibility.…”
Section: Collaborative Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang and Kong (2022) held the same view and proposed that CG can improve the ability of participants to take change actions and improve their adaptability to complex disaster events. Bakkour et al (2015) and Hu et al (2021) studied the case of 2010 mount Merapi uplift in Indonesia and the Wenchuan earthquake in 2008, respectively. They all concluded that large-scale crisis events require better coordination and greater institutional flexibility.…”
Section: Collaborative Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, governments around the world have optimized their risk prevention, control, and disposal systems for single emergencies. However, for compound disasters, there is no effective response to solve complex problems, such as disaster chains and compounding risks [ 28 ]. As compared with the previous practices in emergency management, compound disaster emergency management intensifies the scale and expansion of the interactions and cohesion between emergency organizations [ 29 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has also been shown that political pressure leads to great institutional and conceptual changes, generating post-disaster, organizational double-loop learning [72]. Especially in our post-disaster political environment, leadership directives and policy texts [73] are transmitted to create a synergy of learning in public organizations. As can be seen, the political pressure increases the uncertainty of local crisis learning with respect to major accidents and influences the direction, scope, and intensity of learning in public organizations.…”
Section: The Moderating Effect Of Political Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%