2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-019-5613-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disaster reduction stick equipment: A method for monitoring and early warning of pipeline-landslide hazards

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The characteristics of bamboo ice pressure disaster in different slope directions are: the bamboo forest on the north slope is the most affected, followed by the South and West slopes, and the bamboo forest on the east slope is less affected. The average disaster rate and disaster index of the forest on the north slope are higher than those on the east slope by percentage points and respectively [14]. The average disaster rate, disaster index and the average length of bamboo rupture increase with the East, South, West and north slopes.…”
Section: Figure 2disaster Level At All Levelsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The characteristics of bamboo ice pressure disaster in different slope directions are: the bamboo forest on the north slope is the most affected, followed by the South and West slopes, and the bamboo forest on the east slope is less affected. The average disaster rate and disaster index of the forest on the north slope are higher than those on the east slope by percentage points and respectively [14]. The average disaster rate, disaster index and the average length of bamboo rupture increase with the East, South, West and north slopes.…”
Section: Figure 2disaster Level At All Levelsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…We identified the key monitoring parameters as: 1) rainfall conditions, specifically, hourly, and daily totals; 2) pore water pressure in the shallow surface soil; 3) angular displacement and tilting deformation of unstable slopes; 4) horizontal displacement of the unstable slope to obtain cumulative deformation and the deformation rate. We used our self-developed pipeline slope hazard monitoring stick equipment system (Yan et al, 2019) to measure these parameters.…”
Section: Monitoring and Early Warningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety of pipelines under the action of landslides can be evaluated using strength theory based on monitoring surface displacement and strain of the pipeline slope (Feng and Huang, 2009;Liu et al, 2010;Marinos et al, 2019). To deal with the particularity and complexity of pipeline landslides, Yan et al (2019) developed a multi-parameter comprehensive monitoring system that could be applied to pipeline evaluation using a mechanical model of failure probability (Alvarado-Franco et al, 2017). However, most monitoring approaches separate the pipeline from the slope hazard and only assess hazard occurrence; the impact of the hazard on the pipeline, and the vulnerability of the pipeline, needs further research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…pipeline geological hazards can be effectively identified and early warnings issued (Vasconez et al, 2010). In recent years, with the development of artificial intelligence algorithms, pipeline geological hazard monitoring and early warning have gradually moved toward artificial intelligence-based approaches (Cao et al, 2012;Yan et al, 2019b). Although these monitoring and early warning studies are becoming more mature and effective, the monitoring equipment is often limited to identified pipeline geological hazard areas and cannot yet meet the needs of large-scale identification of pipeline geological hazards.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%