Discharge current of water electrospray with electrical conductivity under high-voltage and high-flow-rate conditions

Kim, Soyeon; Jung, Minkyu; Choi, Sangmi; Lee, Jinwook; Lim, Jihun; Kim, Min Soo

doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2020.110151

Cited by 17 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…A voltage of 1-7 kV was applied to the discharge electrode installed between the 30 nozzles supplying water and the collection electrode capturing PM. As shown in the figure, the collection electrode was installed below the discharge electrode, generating charged microdroplets and capturing PM through the collection electrode [28]. To develop the PM collection efficiency prediction model using the collected data, the Python program-based Scikit-learn library was used [29].…”

Section: Electrostatic Spray-based Wesp Devicementioning

confidence: 99%

Ensemble Prediction Model for Dust Collection Efficiency of Wet Electrostatic Precipitator

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

WESPs (Wet Electrostatic precipitators) are mainly installed in industries and factories where PM (particulate matter) is primarily generated. Such a wet type WESPs exhibits very excellent performance by showing a PM collection efficiency of 97 to 99%, but the PM collection efficiency may decrease rapidly due to a situation in which the dust collector and the discharge electrode is corroded by water. Thus, developing technology to predict efficient PM collection in the design and operation of WESPs is critical. Previous studies have mainly developed machine learning-based models to predict atmospheric PM concentrations using data measured by meteorological agencies. However, the analysis of models for predicting the dust collection efficiency of WESPs installed in factories and industrial facilities is insufficient. In this study, a WESPs was installed, and PM collection experiments were conducted. Nonlinear data such as operating conditions and PM measurements were collected, and ensemble PM collection efficiency prediction models were developed. According to the research results, the random forest model yielded excellent performance, with the best results achieved when the target was PM 7: R2, MAE, and MSE scores of 0.956, 0.747, and 1.748, respectively.

show abstract

Section: Electrostatic Spray-based Wesp Devicementioning

confidence: 99%