“…Some reports are still considering the formation of metal boron hydrides as plausible, ,,, but recent works ,, nicely reviewed by Zhao et al lead to the current consensus that hydrogen sorption has only a minor contribution to energy storage. Indeed, crystalline cobalt borides Co 3 B, Co 2 B , and CoB , have also good capacity and cycling stability, even if they do not show any significant hydrogen sorption. ,, Although differences between amorphous and crystalline metal borides both in terms of crystal structure and particle size/surface area hinder direct comparison of their performances (ranging between 250 and 350 mA h g –1 after 100 cycles), the common mechanism seems to be similar to the oxidation–reduction process described above for boron-rich metal borides in primary alkaline batteries. The charge reaction corresponds to reduction of the Co hydroxide into elemental Co, similar to the reaction occurring in Ni–Cd batteries: CoB x + ( 2 + 6 x ) OH − → Co false( OH false) 2 ( s ) + x BO 3 3 − + 3 x normalH 2 normalO + ( 2 + 3 x ) normale − Co false( OH false) 2 ( s ) + 2 normale − → Co ( s …”