“…For instance, there is often a misconception about what “counts” as text, with an emphasis on textbooks and other print‐based materials and an overreliance on Lexile numbers instead of examining how non‐print‐based texts can provide the provocativeness, ambiguity, and complexity that yield high‐level critical thought (Savitz et al., 2023; Strong et al., 2001). Therefore, professional learning should ensure mutual understanding and the ability to select and use complex, equitable texts within instruction, where certain texts are not privileged in specific content areas over others (e.g., ELA, SS, science, and math); there is a need to explore and understand how other content areas (e.g., music, fine arts, and physical education) also use texts to connect with adolescents (Chandler‐Olcott, 2017; Dobbs et al., 2017; Hinchman & O'Brien, 2019; Lent & Voigt, 2019).…”