Disclosure as a tool in stakeholder relations management: a longitudinal study on the Port of Rotterdam

Abstract

This study applies stakeholder management principles to the port domain. We provide a conceptual framework for evaluating the communication strategies a (landlord) port authority relies on in the management of its relevant stakeholders and the adoption of disclosure to critical issues.The theoretical arguments are supported by empirical evidences from the Port of Rotterdam (PoR), i.e. a major port which leverages on disclosure to successfully manage stakeholders and support the implementation of corporate strategy. The research questions are addressed using a content analysis on the annual reports (ARs) of PoR in the period 2000-2012.The overall research design enables the investigation of PA disclosure as a tool for managing the evolving interests of stakeholders under a longitudinal perspective. The PoR case shows that the relative importance of topics reported in the ARs change over time, as a result of external pressures and internal key events. The outcomes demonstrate the growing attention of PoR on topics relevant to the broader community (e.g. environment, safety/security) after a period characterized by a prominent focus on financial and governance issues. Besides, key breakthrough forces stimulating the shifts in landlord communication strategies are identified and discussed.Finally, by suggesting an indirect approach to evaluate how PA prioritizes its salient stakeholders, the paper adds to extant port literature and brings methodological implications.

Stakeholder Orientation in Cruise Lines’ Mission Statements

“…The adoption of this labor-intensive and time-consuming methodology requires different stages, which we followed in line with similar contributions [50,51].…”

Port performance in container transport logistics: A multi-stakeholder perspective

“…Consequently, conflicts of interests between port stakeholders require them to interpret others' assertiveness correctly so that ports can deliver a high degree of service excellence of modern ports (Schellinck and Brooks, 2014;Ha et al, 2017b). Managing relevant stakeholders has been considered as a key strategy in maritime and port domains to strengthen relations with salient stakeholders (Notteboom et al, 2015). Preston and Sapienza (1990) argued that stakeholder management is a key mean of firm's performance to deliver mutual benefits to all related parties via agreeing their diversified interests.…”

“…This is because ports are complex systems where various individuals and interests coexist, which make port managers have difficulty in making decisions for resource allocation in the management of ports (Notteboom and Winkelmans, 2003;Brooks and Schellinck, 2013). To this end, use of stakeholder management principles is in a high demand in the port and transport logistics domains and they have been profoundly adopted in recent years to reconcile the conflicting interests of different port stakeholders (Lai and Cheng, 2003;Brooks et al, 2011;Lam et al, 2013;Books and Schellinck, 2013;Schellinck and Brooks, 2014;De Martino et al, 2013;Notteboom et al, 2015;Acciaro, 2015). The core of their arguments is that ports have to attach a high level of internal integration within a firm and effective collaboration with the external operation of inter-firms in the supply chain, which in turn leads to overall performance improvement in the whole chain.…”

Port governance revisited: How to govern and for what purpose?

“…Notably, the study by Knatz (2018) is the only study that conducts an archival analysis, which uses a lot of early historical records as empirical data to extract evidence. Content analysis as an emerging method in the port governance research domain has been applied by an increasing number of studies, such as Brooks (2017) and Notteboom et al (2015). Pure mathematical modelling and simulation are not used in the selected studies, which considerably indicates that qualitative methods rather than quantitative methods are dominant in the field.…”