2012
DOI: 10.1093/tropej/fms052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disclosure of Their HIV Status to Infected Children: A Review of the Literature

Abstract: Since the introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (ART) in 1996, HIV-infected children often survive beyond adolescence. To assess worldwide trends in disclosure since ART was introduced, we reviewed articles that refer to disclosure of their status to HIV-infected children, and which described patient, health care provider and/or caregiver opinions about disclosure and/or reported the proportion of children who knew their diagnosis. Most studies (17 [55%]) were performed in low- or middle-income … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
71
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
10
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding that disclosure had often been handled by health workers supports evidence suggesting that carers struggle to discuss disclosure of HIV status with the children in their care (Pinzón-Iregui et al, 2013). Similar to other studies, carers fear the psychological effects and social stigma they perceived might follow from disclosure (Vaz et al, 2008, Vreeman et al, 2010, Mburu et al, 2014.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The finding that disclosure had often been handled by health workers supports evidence suggesting that carers struggle to discuss disclosure of HIV status with the children in their care (Pinzón-Iregui et al, 2013). Similar to other studies, carers fear the psychological effects and social stigma they perceived might follow from disclosure (Vaz et al, 2008, Vreeman et al, 2010, Mburu et al, 2014.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…For example, a review of global data found a lower proportion of children that knew their status in low or middle income countries compared to industrialised countries (Pinzón-Iregui et al, 2013).…”
Section: Dealing With Disclosure: Perspectives From Hiv Positive Chilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In both low-and highresourced countries, rates of disclosure to children and adolescents remain varied, but they are lower in low-resourced countries compared to highresourced countries (Pinzon-Iregui, Beck-Sague, & Malow, 2013). In addition to the differences in disclosure rates between low-and high-resourced countries, there are marked disparities in age at disclosure, as disclosure typically occurs later (generally delayed to 12 years or later) in low-resourced countries (Pinzon-Iregui et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barriers to disclosure include caregiver concerns about a child's cognitive ability to understand the full implications of an HIV diagnosis, the psychosocial impact of disclosure, and the child's ability to maintain confidentiality about their status; fear of stigma and discrimination; caregiver desire for the child to live a normal childhood; parental guilt about infecting the child; discomfort talking about HIV; and fear of anger, blame, rejection, or loss of respect (Domek, 2010;Funck-Brentano et al, 1997;Pinzon-Iregui et al, 2013;Mellins et al, 2002;Miah, 2004;Rwemisisi, Wolff, Coutinho, Grosskurth, & Whitworth, 2008;Wiener et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike children with other chronic diseases, perinatally-infected children are less likely to be told about their illness (Hardy et al, 1994 as cited in Lesch et al, 2007). Worldwide, only a minority of perinatally HIV-infected children know their status; although disclosure is more common in industrialized than in low-and middle-income countries, even in the former, only 30%-40% know (Pinzón-Iregui, Beck-Sagué & Malow, 2013). In the UPR Pediatric HIV/AIDS Research Program, prior to the introduction of the disclosure initiative, 80% of children had received partial, deceptive or no information about their diagnosis .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%