“…Specifically, we examine whether Big 4 auditors play a moderating role in mitigating the negative impact of C-O divergence on disclosure quality resulting in consequent improvement in credit ratings, an indication of the extent of the shareholder–debtholder agency cost. We propose that highly C-O divergent family firms have greater incentives to expropriate debtholders (Johnson et al, 2000; Liu & Tian, 2012; Shleifer & Vishny, 1997), and corporate disclosure constitutes a mechanism that facilitates controlling shareholders by masking the private benefits they derive from their control (Fan & Wong, 2002; Guedhami et al, 2009; Vural, 2018). As such, family firms with a higher C-O divergence are more likely to provide less transparent disclosure than their counterparts with a lower C-O divergence, suggesting a negative relationship between C-O divergence and disclosure quality.…”