2018
DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2018.1479531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disclosure Practices by Family Firms: Evidence from Swedish Publicly Listed Firms

Abstract: I investigate the effect of family ownership on firms' disclosure practices in their annual reports. In specific, I study Swedish publicly listed firms, which are typically characterized by controlling owners that have a strong influence in the corporate governance decisions of the firm, including corporate disclosures. To measure disclosure, I construct a comprehensive disclosure index covering information on (1) corporate governance, (2) strategic and financial targets and (3) notes to the financial statemen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, we examine whether Big 4 auditors play a moderating role in mitigating the negative impact of C-O divergence on disclosure quality resulting in consequent improvement in credit ratings, an indication of the extent of the shareholder–debtholder agency cost. We propose that highly C-O divergent family firms have greater incentives to expropriate debtholders (Johnson et al, 2000; Liu & Tian, 2012; Shleifer & Vishny, 1997), and corporate disclosure constitutes a mechanism that facilitates controlling shareholders by masking the private benefits they derive from their control (Fan & Wong, 2002; Guedhami et al, 2009; Vural, 2018). As such, family firms with a higher C-O divergence are more likely to provide less transparent disclosure than their counterparts with a lower C-O divergence, suggesting a negative relationship between C-O divergence and disclosure quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we examine whether Big 4 auditors play a moderating role in mitigating the negative impact of C-O divergence on disclosure quality resulting in consequent improvement in credit ratings, an indication of the extent of the shareholder–debtholder agency cost. We propose that highly C-O divergent family firms have greater incentives to expropriate debtholders (Johnson et al, 2000; Liu & Tian, 2012; Shleifer & Vishny, 1997), and corporate disclosure constitutes a mechanism that facilitates controlling shareholders by masking the private benefits they derive from their control (Fan & Wong, 2002; Guedhami et al, 2009; Vural, 2018). As such, family firms with a higher C-O divergence are more likely to provide less transparent disclosure than their counterparts with a lower C-O divergence, suggesting a negative relationship between C-O divergence and disclosure quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that the financial reporting of a family-controlled firm will have several distinct features. Vural (2018) investigates disclosure practices in Swedish firms' annual reports using a disclosure index. She documents that family firms disclose less information than non-family firms.…”
Section: Motives Shaping the Initial Accounting For Goodwillmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The researcher found no empirical studies examining the impact of family ownership on corporate governance disclosure. However, Arman and Yonet (2011), Vural (2018), and Ho and Tower (2011) found that family ownership negatively impacted voluntary disclosure. As few studies have examined this particular variable and Kuwait's situation has not yet been explored, the final hypothesis is:…”
Section: Previous Studies and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%