Discoloration of Teeth after Avulsion and Replantation: Results from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

There was no significant difference in periodontal healing between the two medicaments at either a tooth or patient level. The numbers recruited fell short of an estimated power calculation. For patients meeting the inclusion criteria and completing the trial, periodontal healing was seen in 52% of teeth at the 12-month assessment between both groups. The only factor found to significantly influence the periodontal outcome was dry time.

show abstract

“…This outcome is reported in a separate article (26). The only adverse effect of the medicaments was discolouration.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 79%

Periodontal healing following avulsion and replantation of teeth: a multi‐centre randomized controlled trial to compare two root canal medicaments

Day

Gregg

Ashley

et al. 2011

Dental Traumatology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The last position in the ranking list was secured by an article that secured 20 citations (Web of Science) but unfortunately four articles, having the same citation count, had to be excluded (Day et al . , Aggarwal et al . , Monteiro et al .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A bibliometric study of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim To identify and analyse the main features of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals from 1961 to 2018. Methodology The Clarivate Analytics’ Web of Science ‘All Databases’ was used to search and analyse the 100 most frequently cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses having ‘randomized’, ‘randomised’, ‘randomized controlled’, ‘randomised controlled’, ‘randomized controlled trial’, ‘randomized controlled trials’, ‘clinical trial’, ‘systematic’, ‘systematic review’, ‘meta‐analysis’, and ‘meta‐analyses’ in the title section. The ‘International Endodontic Journal’, ‘Journal of Endodontics’, ‘Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology’, ‘Australian Endodontic Journal’, ‘Endodontics & Dental Traumatology’, ‘Endo‐Endodontic Practice Today’ and ‘European Endodontic Journal’ were included in the publication name section. After ranking the articles in a descending order based on their citation counts, each article was cross‐matched with the citation counts in Elsevier's Scopus and Google Scholar. The articles were analysed, and information on citation counts, citation density, year of publication, contributing authors, institutions and countries, journal of publication, study design, topic of the article and keywords was extracted. Results The citation counts of the 100 most‐cited articles varied from 235 to 20 (Web of Science), 276 to 17 (Scopus) and 696 to 1 (Google Scholar). The year in which the top 100 articles were published was 2010 (n = 13). Among 373 authors, the greatest number of articles was associated with three individuals namely Reader A (n = 5), Beck M (n = 5) and Kvist T (n = 5). Most of the articles originated from the United States (n = 24) with the greatest contribution from Ohio State University (USA) (n = 5). Randomized controlled trials were the most frequent study design (n = 45) followed by systematic reviews (n = 30) with outcome studies of root canal treatment being the major topic (n = 35). The Journal of Endodontics published the largest number of included articles (n = 70) followed by the International Endodontic Journal (n = 27). Among 259 unique keywords, meta‐analysis (n = 23) and systematic review (n = 23) were the most frequently used. Conclusion This study has revealed that year of publication had no obvious impact on citation count. The bibliometric analysis highlighted the quantity and quality of research, and the evolution of scientific advancements made in the field of Endodontology over time. Articles before 1996, that is prior to the CONSORT statement that encouraged authors to include specific terms in the title and keywords, may not have been included in this electronic search.

show abstract

“…Crown colour changes were measured based on the method described by Day et al (2011) using an objective digital camera system (IKAM). IKAM photographs were taken at baseline (immediately after treatment) and 2 years (18-27 months, mean = 24 months).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A prospective clinical study of regenerative endodontic treatment of traumatized immature teeth with necrotic pulps using bi‐antibiotic paste

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Traumatized immature teeth with necrotic pulps treated with revitalization endodontic technique did not demonstrate continuation of root development or dentine formation when assessed by periapical radiographs. However, apical closure and periodontal healing were observed. A measurable change in crown colour (yellower, redder and lighter), with mostly no aesthetic concern to the patients/parents, was also observed.

show abstract

Discoloration of Teeth after Avulsion and Replantation: Results from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Cited by 39 publications

References 23 publications

Periodontal healing following avulsion and replantation of teeth: a multi‐centre randomized controlled trial to compare two root canal medicaments

Periodontal healing following avulsion and replantation of teeth: a multi‐centre randomized controlled trial to compare two root canal medicaments

A bibliometric study of the top 100 most‐cited randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses published in endodontic journals

A prospective clinical study of regenerative endodontic treatment of traumatized immature teeth with necrotic pulps using bi‐antibiotic paste

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About