2006
DOI: 10.1101/lm.246906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disconnection analysis of CA3 and DG in mediating encoding but not retrieval in a spatial maze learning task

Abstract: The dentate gyrus (DG) subregion of the hippocampus has been shown to be involved in encoding but not retrieval in a spatial maze task (modified Hebb-Williams maze). The first experiment in this study examined whether a lesion to the CA3 would contribute to a similar encoding deficit. A DG group was included in order to replicate previous results. Relative to controls, animals receiving CA3 lesions were impaired in encoding, not retrieval, on the modified Hebb-Williams maze-similar to a group that received DG … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
74
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The assumption made in this analysis was that the encoding of spatial information predominated during day 1, and retrieval of consolidated spatial information predominated during the first five trials during day 2. The results from testing rats in the Hebb-Williams maze indicate that CA3a,b, but not CA1, lesions impair within-day learning (encoding) and CA1, but not CA3a,b, lesions impair retrieval across days (Jerman et al 2006;Vago et al 2007). Finally, CA3 lesioned rats are impaired in the standard water maze task, which requires multiple trials (Brun et al 2002;Florian and Roullet 2004), although mice that lacked NMDA receptors in CA3 do not appear to be impaired in learning the water maze (Nakazawa et al 2002).…”
Section: Encoding Over Multiple Trialsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The assumption made in this analysis was that the encoding of spatial information predominated during day 1, and retrieval of consolidated spatial information predominated during the first five trials during day 2. The results from testing rats in the Hebb-Williams maze indicate that CA3a,b, but not CA1, lesions impair within-day learning (encoding) and CA1, but not CA3a,b, lesions impair retrieval across days (Jerman et al 2006;Vago et al 2007). Finally, CA3 lesioned rats are impaired in the standard water maze task, which requires multiple trials (Brun et al 2002;Florian and Roullet 2004), although mice that lacked NMDA receptors in CA3 do not appear to be impaired in learning the water maze (Nakazawa et al 2002).…”
Section: Encoding Over Multiple Trialsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Given the observed selective deficits in retrieval of spatial cues necessary for navigation of a maze and previous evidence implicating CA1 in retrieval (Hasselmo, 1995;Hasselmo et al, 1995;Sybirska et al, 2000;Kesner et al, 2004;Lee and Kesner, 2004b;Jerman et al, 2006;Rolls and Kesner, 2006), we reasoned that similar selective deficits may be apparent in additional CA1-dependent tasks. It has been shown previously that CA3-lesioned rats are significantly impaired on the acquisition, but not retention of contextual fear-conditioning whereas, CA1 lesioned rats are significantly impaired on retention but not acquisition (Lee and Kesner, 2004a).…”
Section: The Effects Of Apomorphine On Acquisition Of Contextual Fearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encoding of information acquired in a Hebb-Williams maze or in contextual fear conditioning, using a within-days analysis, is impaired by targeted lesions to the CA3 and dentate gyrus (DG) subregions, but not from targeted lesions to the CA1 subregion. In contrast, using a between-days analysis, retention and retrieval is disrupted following CA1, but not following CA3 or DG lesions (Lee and Kesner, 2004a;Lee and Kesner, 2004b;Jerman et al, 2006). Impairments have also been demonstrated in delay-dependent retrieval without impairing immediate recall or encoding of spatial information after infusing glutamatergic antagonists (Lee and Kesner, 2002), or cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (Sharifzadeh et al, 2006) into the CA1 subregion, but not when infused into the CA3 subregion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CA1 region also appears to be involved in retrieval after longer time delays, with rats lesioned in the CA1 region having no difficulty in encoding new information but impaired in retrieval after a 24-h interval [100,212]. Additionally, lesions made in the CA1 region 24 h post training in a water maze disrupted subsequent recall, whilst CA1 lesions made 3 weeks later did not disrupt retrieval of task [164].…”
Section: Ca1 Region-role In Memory Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%