2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabet.2021.101317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discontinuation and non-publication rates of U.S. clinical trials for the pharmacologic treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Con rming our hypothesis, our cross-sectional analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov database found a substantial rate of discontinuation among clinical trials in the eld of orthopaedic oncology, with 19.2% of the evaluated trials being discontinued (Table 1). This nding was in alignment with prior discontinuation investigations in various elds of medicine, which demonstrate discontinuation rates between 10-30% 12,14,17 . High rates of discontinuation may be attributed to a variety of factors, such as recruitment di culties, moral dilemmas, safety worries, operational challenges, and limited resources 14 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Con rming our hypothesis, our cross-sectional analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov database found a substantial rate of discontinuation among clinical trials in the eld of orthopaedic oncology, with 19.2% of the evaluated trials being discontinued (Table 1). This nding was in alignment with prior discontinuation investigations in various elds of medicine, which demonstrate discontinuation rates between 10-30% 12,14,17 . High rates of discontinuation may be attributed to a variety of factors, such as recruitment di culties, moral dilemmas, safety worries, operational challenges, and limited resources 14 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Logistic regression adjusted for funding source, intervention, and enrollment size, similar to prior studies 3,22 . Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) with their corresponding 95% Con dence Intervals (CI) and p-values were calculated to determine the signi cance of the association.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations