1976
DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(76)90818-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discontinuity spacings in rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
167
2
22

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 601 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
167
2
22
Order By: Relevance
“…These steeply dipping, subparallel fractures generally strike perpendicular to the current regional least principal stress, and the spatial frequency of their cleavage, h, is proportional to the thickness of the lithologic unit, H (Fig. 4;Priest and Hudson 1976;Bai and Pollard 2000). Transmissivities associated with these fractures are not particularly sensitive to changes in vertical loading over the relatively shallow depths observed in well logging (Morin et al 1997).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These steeply dipping, subparallel fractures generally strike perpendicular to the current regional least principal stress, and the spatial frequency of their cleavage, h, is proportional to the thickness of the lithologic unit, H (Fig. 4;Priest and Hudson 1976;Bai and Pollard 2000). Transmissivities associated with these fractures are not particularly sensitive to changes in vertical loading over the relatively shallow depths observed in well logging (Morin et al 1997).…”
Section: Tectonic Settingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Hooker et al (2013)), it is defined as the area of the fracture face (length and aperture) for the present two-dimensional study. Fracture-size distributions have been found to either being centred onto a specific value with fewer smaller or larger values present (Priest & Hudson 1976) or are scale-independent for example in power-law size distributions (Ortega et al, 2006).…”
Section: Cleat Length Aperture and Size Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Priest and Hudson (1976) [10] found that a reasonable estimate of RQD could be obtained from discontinuity spacing measurements made on core or from an exposure by use of the equation:…”
Section: Rqd Determined From Face Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%