2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2010.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discontinuous subgrid formulations for transport problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To get rid of the local oscillations, many nonlinear stabilized finite element methods have been developed by adding an extra diffusivity term to the formulation to recover the monotonicity of the continuous problem [1,11,20,25,31,37,[48][49][50][51]. Such methods lead to nonlinear systems due to the introduction of nonlinear artificial dissipation dynamically adjusted in terms of the notion of scale separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To get rid of the local oscillations, many nonlinear stabilized finite element methods have been developed by adding an extra diffusivity term to the formulation to recover the monotonicity of the continuous problem [1,11,20,25,31,37,[48][49][50][51]. Such methods lead to nonlinear systems due to the introduction of nonlinear artificial dissipation dynamically adjusted in terms of the notion of scale separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key feature of the method in [15] is a more flexible fine-scale basis that consists of multiple local polynomial functions that may be nonzero on element boundaries. Sub-scale models that do not vanish at element boundaries also appear elsewhere in the literature [16][17][18][19]. However, the approach in [15] is distinct in that the element boundary terms are assumed to be negligible and interelement continuity of the fine-scales is not explicitly enforced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great variety of Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods have been proposed and analyzed over the last decades for elliptic [7,15,3,4,14,16,27,8,26,5], parabolic [2,25] and hyperbolic [24,22,18,19,1,20,21] problems. Robustness, flexibility for implementing h and p-adaptivity strategies and easy parallelization are well known advantages of DG methods arising from the use of broken finite element spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the ideas supporting hybridization techniques and the MDG method we propose in [5] the locally discontinuous but globally continuous finite element method (LDGC). This method combines the advantages of Discontinuous Galerkin methods with the element based data structure and reduced computational cost of classical conforming finite element methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation