2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discordance between FISH, IHC, and NGS Analysis of ALK Status in Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): a Brief Report of 7 Cases

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement represents a landmark in the targeted therapy of non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is a sensitive and specific method to detect ALK protein expression, possibly an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In this study, the concordance of FISH and IHC to determine ALK status was evaluated, particularly focusing on discordant cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: ALK status was tested by FISH and the IHC validated m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…importance of careful interpretation of the ALK FISH assay. Diverse diagnostic modalities are highly recommended in ambiguous cases to insure the proper treatment for patients eligible for TKI therapy [19][20][21][22][23]. Based on our findings we strongly recommend the inclusion of the highly challenging atypical pattern of 3′ signal attenuation into the official guidelines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…importance of careful interpretation of the ALK FISH assay. Diverse diagnostic modalities are highly recommended in ambiguous cases to insure the proper treatment for patients eligible for TKI therapy [19][20][21][22][23]. Based on our findings we strongly recommend the inclusion of the highly challenging atypical pattern of 3′ signal attenuation into the official guidelines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…23,26,[28][29][30][31][32] However, only a few studies investigated the reliability of NGS as compared with other traditional detection methods. [18][19][20][21][22][23] In this study, we compared NGS -a method that has become routinely used in clinical oncology due to its multiplex-ability-with IHC -an established method that is routinely used for the molecular diagnosis of ALK in the clinical setting. Based on our data, ALK detection using NGS and IHC was 77.3% to 78.9% concordant, which is slightly lower than a previous report that demonstrated an 87.3% concordance rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18] In addition to mutation status, the details of ALK fusion gene partners can also be revealed by NGS. Although previous reports have explored the utility of NGS in detecting ALK rearrangements and indicated that NGS-based ALKpositive status may predict clinical benefit with crizotinib, [19][20][21][22][23] the association between ALK status assessed by NGS and therapeutic response from crizotinib has not been well validated. Studies with larger sample size are needed to establish the role of NGS in selecting patients eligible for crizotinib treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NGS is technology with the ability to perform and capture data from millions of sequencing reactions simultaneously. All NGS platforms are able to catch the individual sequence of hundreds of millions of molecules at the genome or transcriptome level 28,[64][65][66][67] . One obstacle to initiating NGS in routine practice is the high initial costs as it method is currently more expensive than the methods above.…”
Section: Gene Rearrangement Detection In Nsclc Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) (ref. 26,67 ). IHC is still the most used and remains the gold standard in ALK rearrangement detection.…”
Section: Gene Rearrangement Detection In Nsclc Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%