2021
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.753810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discordance Between Glucose Levels Measured in Interstitial Fluid vs in Venous Plasma After Oral Glucose Administration: A Post-Hoc Analysis From the Randomised Controlled PRE-D Trial

Abstract: AimsThe oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is together with haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) gold standard for diagnosing prediabetes and diabetes. The objective of this study was to assess the concordance between glucose values obtained from venous plasma versus interstitial fluid after oral glucose administration in 120 individuals with prediabetes and overweight/obesity.Methods120 adults with prediabetes defined by HbA1c 39-47 mmol/mol and overweight or obesity who participated in the randomised controlled PRE-D tri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A diffusion time delay of 5-15 min was observed by different types of optical spectroscopies when 50-75 g of glucose was taken orally in an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT; Kottmann et al, 2016;Huang et al, 2003;Pleitez et al, 2013). A variation in the lag time is associated with the rate of glucose diffusion, the magnitude of concentration difference in various tissues, blood flow, blood vessel permeability to glucose, and acute changes in the release of insulin and glucagon (Faerch et al, 2021). However, the lag time we obtained in the OMTT is higher than that of the OGTT (∼ 15 min vs. ∼ 45 min).…”
Section: In Vivo Measurementmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…A diffusion time delay of 5-15 min was observed by different types of optical spectroscopies when 50-75 g of glucose was taken orally in an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT; Kottmann et al, 2016;Huang et al, 2003;Pleitez et al, 2013). A variation in the lag time is associated with the rate of glucose diffusion, the magnitude of concentration difference in various tissues, blood flow, blood vessel permeability to glucose, and acute changes in the release of insulin and glucagon (Faerch et al, 2021). However, the lag time we obtained in the OMTT is higher than that of the OGTT (∼ 15 min vs. ∼ 45 min).…”
Section: In Vivo Measurementmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Indeed, our results showed that the 20/20% consistency decreased from 95.00% on day 1 to 85.71% on 14, and the MARD% increased from 8.73 2.65% on day 1 to 11.86 ± 3.14% on day 14, which was the same as other CGMs and should be further improved. Previous studies suggested CGM might not be a suitable tool for assessing glucose in prediabetes [24]. However, our study did not focus on the high-risk patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…For example, the glucose management indicator-based on the average glucose from CGM readings-has been used as a surrogate for HbA1c, but it overestimates measured HbA1c in people without diabetes [107]. In addition, Faerch et al reported discordance between plasma glucose and CGM during an OGTT in adults with prediabetes [108].…”
Section: Can We Use Continuous Glucose Monitoring To Diagnose Prediab...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Færch et al. reported discordance between plasma glucose and CGM during an OGTT in adults with prediabetes [108].…”
Section: Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%