2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.10.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discordance between urine pH measured by dipstick and pH meter: Implications for methotrexate administration protocols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical cut-off for the urine pH should be pH 8.0, but after several experiments and sampling, the result using the dipstick was less than pH 8.0. However, when a pH meter was used, the result was greater than pH 8.0 [18].…”
Section: Ph Levelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The clinical cut-off for the urine pH should be pH 8.0, but after several experiments and sampling, the result using the dipstick was less than pH 8.0. However, when a pH meter was used, the result was greater than pH 8.0 [18].…”
Section: Ph Levelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In clinical practice, dipsticks are often used, which are much more available but less accurate, providing a value only up to the nearest 0.5 unit interval and being prone to perception bias when electronic readers are not used. Although dipsticks are useful in most situations, differences between dipstick and pH-meter readings can be as high as 0.4–0.5 units ( 19 – 21 ), even with electronic readers ( 22 , 23 ). These differences might be clinically significant and thus lead to wrong clinical decisions in specific contexts ( 22 ).…”
Section: Introduction: Physiology and Technical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although dipsticks are useful in most situations, differences between dipstick and pH-meter readings can be as high as 0.4–0.5 units ( 19 – 21 ), even with electronic readers ( 22 , 23 ). These differences might be clinically significant and thus lead to wrong clinical decisions in specific contexts ( 22 ).…”
Section: Introduction: Physiology and Technical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantages of automated urinalysis established in human medicine include decreased operator time, decreased turn‐around time (if the automated results are connected to the laboratory information management system or LIMS), increased precision (decreased intra‐ and interobserver error), elimination of transcription error to the LIMS, and the potential for improved accuracy . Increased accuracy is particularly important for some analytes, such as pH, which are known to suffer from poor diagnostic accuracy using dipstick urinalysis techniques …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%