“…In this sense, the temporality of Laurel and Hardy's comedy can be seen as analogous to the temporality of masochism, the aestheticism of which, as Jean Ma has pointed out in a different context, mirrors precisely Adorno's insistence that "art enunciates the disaster by identifying with it." 88 The leap between disaster and comedy seems like a precarious one to make; yet for Deleuze, it is precisely this leap-over the Death Instinct and into the realm of the pleasure principle-that masochism's "terrible force of repetition" enables.89 Whereas one might think that masochism's dependence on repetition reflects a conservative investment in the reproduction of the same, Deleuze argues that the coldness and desexualization associated with masochism (qualities that have also been associated with Laurel and Hardy) "[make] repetition autonomous," allow it to "[run] wild and [become] independent of all previous pleasure. "90 Resisting the violence of the law without any promise of redemption, the subversive potential of masochism's repetitious and "frozen scenes" does not oppose, but rather works through, the comic force.…”