2017
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discordant non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) - a systematic review

Abstract: With a high sensitivity and specificity, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is an incomparable screening test for fetal aneuploidy. However, the method is rather newly introduced, and experiences with discordant results are few. We did a systematic review of literature reporting details of false positive and false negative NIPT results. Discordant sex chromosome results were not included. We identified 22 studies reporting case details. In total, 206 discordant cases were included, of which 88% were false po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
188
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
188
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using cell‐free placental DNA in maternal blood, which is suspected to originate from placental trophoblast cells, to estimate the risk of aneuploidy in the fetus itself has introduced new challenges in the interpretation of this prenatal screening test. Results of analysis of cell‐free placental DNA may be comparable with those from chromosome analysis after short term culture, which could explain some of the false positive results . Also, when offering noninvasive techniques without prior cFTS, it is possible that even a very low frequency of trisomic cells will be disclosed in some placentas, thereby identifying chromosomal mosaicism that would not have been identified using the previous techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using cell‐free placental DNA in maternal blood, which is suspected to originate from placental trophoblast cells, to estimate the risk of aneuploidy in the fetus itself has introduced new challenges in the interpretation of this prenatal screening test. Results of analysis of cell‐free placental DNA may be comparable with those from chromosome analysis after short term culture, which could explain some of the false positive results . Also, when offering noninvasive techniques without prior cFTS, it is possible that even a very low frequency of trisomic cells will be disclosed in some placentas, thereby identifying chromosomal mosaicism that would not have been identified using the previous techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current NIPT methodology thus relies on identifying a chromosomal abnormality in an amalgamation of maternal and fetal DNA fragments, which can lead to false positive results, and its performance can be affected by a below average fetal fraction (<4%). cfDNA‐based NIPT is also potentially influenced by maternal chromosomal mosaicism or maternal malignancies . It thus remains a screening test requiring diagnostic testing for confirmation of positive results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cumulatively, NIPT has an approximately 1% false‐positive rate, one‐third of which has a biological explanation such as maternal copy number variant, maternal mosaicism, maternal malignancy, confined placental mosaicism, fetal mosaicism or a vanishing twin. The rate of vanishing twin pregnancy detected by NIPT ranges from 0.42 to 0.6%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%