2004
DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200404000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discordant prevalence of hypertension using two different automated blood pressure measurement devices: a population-based study in Dar es Salaam (Tanzania)

Abstract: A large discrepancy in the estimated prevalence of blood pressure categories was observed using two different automatic measurement devices. This emphasizes that prevalence estimates based on automatic devices should be considered with caution.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this problem is encountered less frequently with wrist-type monitors. Because the wrist size is more similar between obese and non-obese individuals, the wrist-type BP monitor measurements are not affected to such a great extent as arm cuff monitors by body size [ 26 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this problem is encountered less frequently with wrist-type monitors. Because the wrist size is more similar between obese and non-obese individuals, the wrist-type BP monitor measurements are not affected to such a great extent as arm cuff monitors by body size [ 26 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The device is validated in this group of patients, too; that is, these devices are able to make accurate measurements regardless of the thickness of the arm or wrist. In their comparisons carried out with electronic equipment, Chiolero et al [27] obtained results showing that the measurement values of devices that measure at the wrist were not affected by the thickness of the arm or by obesity. In another study, Cuckson et al [28] showed that the Omron RX model produced results close to those of a mercurial device if used with an appropriate cuff in those with an arm circumference greater than 33 cm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 However, proper validation and calibration of such devices are necessary because substantial systematic bias can exist between different models and manufacturers. [28][29][30] Unfortunately, few devices have been validated for use in children. 31 Moreover, current validation protocols are quite lenient and allow, for example, for systematic underestimates or overestimates of BP by as much as 5 mm Hg.…”
Section: Limitations Related To Bp Estimation In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%