Discourse Analysis and its Utility for Urban Policy Research

Abstract

In recent years, discourse analysis has been deployed by academics as a methodology to understand the urban policy implementation process, in particular, the ways in which key actors exercise power. Much of the discourse-based research in urban policy has drawn upon the writings of Norman Fairclough and Michel Foucault and seeks to provide a critical scrutiny of texts and utterances of policy makers and other key actors. The methodological assumption that informs discourse-based approaches is that politics is an arena in which different interest groups seek to establish a particular narrative or version of events as a means to pursue political objectives. This article begins by setting out the theoretical influences that have informed discourse analysis. There then follows a discussion of some of the studies that have deployed discourse-based research within urban policy, an evaluation of its strengths and weaknesses as a method and an assessment for new areas of enquiry. The article's conclusion is that discourse analysis provides the researcher with a set of tools to interpret urban policy in a theoretically informed and insightful way. However, there are some pitfalls associated with its techniques that require consideration before any analysis should commence.

A Case Study of Parents' School Choice Strategies in a Finnish Urban Context

“…The purpose is to represent which discourses are used and how, the content of those discourses, and what is left hidden. Discourses classify people, issues and courses of events by limiting and excluding certain discourses and by including others (Fairclough, 1992(Fairclough, /2004Jacobs, 2006). It is essential to make explicit those discourses which build and construct knowledge.…”

‘Red dust homelessness’: Housing, home and homelessness in remote Australia

“…This paper highlights the social inequalities and contested dynamics of power between urban and rural constructions of homelessness and service provision (Jacobs, 2006), by making visible the material circumstances and diverse perspectives of people's living and working in remote Western Australia.…”

Justifying and resisting public park commercialisation: The battle for Battersea Park

“…Lees, 2004). Rhetorical analysis is 'particularly useful' for urban policy researchers 'interested in analysing, in detail, data gathered from interviews' (Jacobs, 2006: 42), hence its use here. Billig (1991) regards thinking and the holding of opinions as something that is both ideological and rhetorical.…”