2014
DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2014.910109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discourse and the containment of disability in higher education: an institutional analysis

Abstract: We use a social model of disability to examine disability discourse at a regional university in the mid-western United States. Using an institutional unit of analysis and several different information sources (e.g. interviews, federal regulations, syllabus texts, surveys), we illustrate the ways in which disability-as-difference is governed by an architecture of containment at the university.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This view minimizes disability: if people feel disability is only a specific person's problem, they don't need to pay attention to it. 68 Improving the workplace experience for librarians with disabilities requires a valuing of differences and a broader focus on cultural and social attitudes and on structural change, rather than on individuals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view minimizes disability: if people feel disability is only a specific person's problem, they don't need to pay attention to it. 68 Improving the workplace experience for librarians with disabilities requires a valuing of differences and a broader focus on cultural and social attitudes and on structural change, rather than on individuals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a secondary outcome of this project, we hoped that students at the university in question would have the opportunity to meet other autistic people they would not meet otherwise, therefore enabling them to form a greater number of social bonds. Through this process, we were able to move away from an "architecture of containment" (Gabel andMiskovic, 2014, p. 1145)namely, the controlling of disability through difference in the university spaceto present a more inclusive design.…”
Section: Fieldworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Es importante enfatizar que, aunque distinguimos entre tres trayectorias empíricas, mayoritariamente la voz sigue la macro trayectoria de servir de heurístico para descubrir barreras del proceso de la inclusión de personas con discapacidad (Bartlett, 2017;Bell, 2014;Bunbury, 2018;Collins et al 2018;Gabel & Miskovic, 2014;Genova, 2015;Glaser & Van Pletzer, 2012;Glazzard & Dale, 2015;Jagoe & Roseingrave, 2011;Mantey, 2017;Koca-Atabey et al, 2011;López & Moriña, 2015;Mathews, 2009;Moriña, 2012;Myhill et al, 2012;Parker & Draves, 2017;Parsons, 2015;Pernia, 2008;Saerberg, 2010;Stalker et al, 2011;Trowsdale & Hayhow, 2013;von Benzon, 2010). Sin embargo, deslindamos dos trayectorias más específicas que refuerzan la premisa del modelo social respecto de que la discapacidad se profundiza y se reproduce mediante barreras sociopolíticas.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Específicamente en educación superior, constituyen desafíos particulares la deficiente formación de los profesores, el uso estigmatizador del término "discapacidades ocultas" u otras etiquetas que refieran a las dificultades de aprendizaje de los estudiantes, la utilización inadecuada de los recursos de acomodación disponibles, la implementación de estrategias de contención que no visibilizan a los estudiantes discapacitados sino que los aísla de los espacios regulares de interacciones, la falta de preparación con que egresan los estudiantes con discapacidad para insertarse en el mercado laboral, y la existencia de entornos institucionales que no siguen las pautas arquitectónicas de diseño universal (Bunbury, 2018;Collins et al, 2018;Gabel & Miskovic, 2014;Koca-Atabey et al, 2011;López & Moriña, 2015;Mathews, 2009;Moriña, 2012).…”
Section: Voz Que Descubre Barreras En El Proceso De La Inclusión De Punclassified