2021
DOI: 10.1080/0163853x.2021.1924000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discourse Markers Activate Their, Like, Cohort Competitors

Abstract: Speech in everyday conversations is riddled with discourse markers (DMs), such as well, you know, and like. However, in many lab-based studies of speech comprehension, such DMs are typically absent from the carefully articulated and highly controlled speech stimuli. As such, little is known about how these DMs influence online word recognition. The present study specifically investigated the online processing of DM like and how it influences the activation of words in the mental lexicon. We specifically target… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given how complex it is to grasp the discursive functions of DMs in bilingual and monolingual speech, such a concise, well-structured description is a very valuable contribution to linguistics, but also to other fields, such as psychology, and sociology. Further discourse analysis and psycholinguistic work could also have been cited to substantiate and measure some of the claims (Rasenberg, Rommers & Van Bergen 2020, Bosker, Badaya & Corley 2021, but the focused style of the chapter makes it very pleasant to read. As far as the sociological dimension is concerned, I wonder whether it is necessary to use the terms 'socio-economic values' and 'emblematic status', instead of referring to the more established concepts of 'overt and covert prestige' (Labov 1966).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given how complex it is to grasp the discursive functions of DMs in bilingual and monolingual speech, such a concise, well-structured description is a very valuable contribution to linguistics, but also to other fields, such as psychology, and sociology. Further discourse analysis and psycholinguistic work could also have been cited to substantiate and measure some of the claims (Rasenberg, Rommers & Van Bergen 2020, Bosker, Badaya & Corley 2021, but the focused style of the chapter makes it very pleasant to read. As far as the sociological dimension is concerned, I wonder whether it is necessary to use the terms 'socio-economic values' and 'emblematic status', instead of referring to the more established concepts of 'overt and covert prestige' (Labov 1966).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%