Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '03 2003
DOI: 10.3115/1075096.1075167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discourse segmentation of multi-party conversation

Abstract: We present a domain-independent topic segmentation algorithm for multi-party speech. Our feature-based algorithm combines knowledge about content using a text-based algorithm as a feature and about form using linguistic and acoustic cues about topic shifts extracted from speech. This segmentation algorithm uses automatically induced decision rules to combine the different features. The embedded text-based algorithm builds on lexical cohesion and has performance comparable to state-of-the-art algorithms based o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
296
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(304 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
296
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…They were chosen because they have been used in previous work for topic segmentation, summarization, and keyword extraction [2,9,20]. In total, there are 134 topic segments in the 26 meetings.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were chosen because they have been used in previous work for topic segmentation, summarization, and keyword extraction [2,9,20]. In total, there are 134 topic segments in the 26 meetings.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Galley et al [34], we have explored two basic approaches to this task [30]. An unsupervised approach, LCSeg, does not require a training set of hand-marked topic boundaries, but can automatically infer topic boundaries as points where the statistics of text change significantly.…”
Section: Topic Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarity Features Three features were used which capture the lexical similarity between two comments: TF-IDF, LSA ( [5]) and Lexical Cohesion( [3]). For each comment, each of these three scores was calculated for both the preceding and following comment (0 if there was no comment before or after), giving a total of six similarity features.…”
Section: Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%