2013
DOI: 10.5456/wpll.15.4.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discourses of ‘Fair Access’ in English Higher Education: What do institutional statements tell us about university stratification and market positioning?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher status institutions could focus their WP efforts on activities intended to ameliorate the impact of student fees, offering generous bursaries to targeted groups of students (McCaig & Adnett 2009;McCaig 2011). They could also focus their outreach efforts on high-achieving potential students, creating competition over a small number of socially disadvantaged but suitably qualified young people, as noted by analyses of access agreement statements, (Graham 2013;Bowl and Hughes 2013;McCaig 2015). Institutions already recruiting large numbers of WP students (and thus larger numbers of those entitled to a bursary due to their low-income backgrounds) offered less generous financial support, leading to a significant overlap between student recruitment and widening participation aims.…”
Section: The 2004 Act: Widening Participation Enters the Marketisatio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher status institutions could focus their WP efforts on activities intended to ameliorate the impact of student fees, offering generous bursaries to targeted groups of students (McCaig & Adnett 2009;McCaig 2011). They could also focus their outreach efforts on high-achieving potential students, creating competition over a small number of socially disadvantaged but suitably qualified young people, as noted by analyses of access agreement statements, (Graham 2013;Bowl and Hughes 2013;McCaig 2015). Institutions already recruiting large numbers of WP students (and thus larger numbers of those entitled to a bursary due to their low-income backgrounds) offered less generous financial support, leading to a significant overlap between student recruitment and widening participation aims.…”
Section: The 2004 Act: Widening Participation Enters the Marketisatio...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the term widening participation remained in the policy discourse as a generic descriptive term for any change in the social composition of the expanding number of students in the system (as well as 'feelgood' wider policy goal), the priorities of 'fair access' for the 'most able' were the prescribed variety of WP for those parts of the system that were concerned with maintaining the 'Global Excellence' of the UK HE brand. As noted by critical discourse analyses of the first set of OFFA access agreements after 2006 (Graham 2013, Bowl and Hughes 2013, McCaig 2011, only by offering social mobility to the selected few would pre-1992 institutions justify charging the new maximum fee. Hence, widening participation became ever more important to the differentiation of the market.…”
Section: Accelerating the Shift Towards Institutional Responsibility ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the focus and method of the analysis were developed in a separate but related small study conducted during the first term of my doctoral research. The method is informed by other studies which use critical discourse analysis as an approach to analysing the ways that HE is represented in documents such as institutional mission statements (Bowl and Hughes, 2013), access agreements, (McCaig, 2015), educational news supplements (Leathwood, 2013) and marketing campaigns (Farber and Hom, 2005;Graham, 2013;Symes and Drew, 2017). Each of these studies takes the position that public-facing documents such as these both reflect and shape the ways that HE is discursively understood.…”
Section: Documentary Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there has been a number of studies concerned with the contents and contexts of access agreements (Bowl and Hughes, 2013;McCaig and Adnett, 2009;McCaig, 2015;Rainford, 2016) and syntheses of WP research (Gorard and Smith, 2006;Kettley, 2007;Sheeran et al, 2007), there has been no study that focuses specifically on how research is engaged in access agreements. In exploring the different ways that research is understood and discussed, this paper calls for greater cohesion between policy, practice and research at institutional levels to inform and influence national and international policy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of access agreements thus presents the opportunity to think through tensions at the heart of WP discourse and practice; namely, its potential and its performance. Bowl and Hughes (2013; have argued that the highly controlled nature of the documents means that they present an ambivalent commitment to WP. Institutions maintain, Bowl and Hughes argue, an uneasy "balance between the social justice mission and operating in a global market", suggesting that what can be read presents a move "against social justice " (2013: 23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%