Discourses of Flood Disaster Preparedness by NGOs: Humanitarian Aid, Teamwork and Victimization

Abstract

In recent years global warming and climate change due to human activity and natural phenomena, have become recognized as major contributors to the increased occurrence of flood events worldwide. Similarly, the frequency and seriousness of floods in Malaysia have made it a major threat to the country. To this end, research on flood disaster has increased. Most investigations have however, focused on engineering fields, thus there is a real need for research on human activities, response and involvement. Addressing the need for research on human involvement in flood, we adopt a social constructionist perspective to investigate the discursive construction of knowledge about flood disaster preparedness by NGOs commonly involved in flood mitigation and management in Johor. We draw on the perspective that disaster discourses reveal interpretations and perceptions of ways of understanding flood disaster, and that different discourses directly shape and influence response and action for flood mitigation and management. The data consists of four in-depth semi-structured interviews with officers from various NGOs. Adopting van Leeuwen's Critical Discourse Analytic approach, i.e. recontextualisation if social practice and representation of social actors and social action, the findings show that the members from NGOs employ various discourses such as discourses of flood causation, discourses of teamwork and humanitarian which have a direct impact on their actions/ response during the floods. More specifically, these discourses highlight more of what they do rather than the communities being helped. The study posits that the discourses not only show the positioning of the NGOs as humanitarians called on to help others, but via a discourse of victimization, they construct flood risk communities as helpless victims awaiting assistance. It advocates a change in mindset of the various parties involved in flood disaster mitigation and management in Malaysia, from that of perceiving the community as victims to survivors, thereby tapping on the communities' resourcefulness via discourses of empowerment, communitarianism and responsibilization.

Team Dynamics and Nontechnical Skills Perception During the Disaster Response in Mozambique in 2019: A Survey Study Among the Italian Emergency Medical Team

“…Specifically, the “communication” (including dialogue, daily briefing, and sharing information), the “good management” (interpreted as definition of roles, leadership, and organization), and the “good practice principles” (such as empathy, patience, coordination, and respect) (see Table 3 for the coding of the themes), have been identified as key aspects for positive outcomes in the field. This is widely confirmed by the literature: in their interviews-based studies, Peller et al, 11 found inter-professional collaboration and communication as important nontechnical core competencies, while Selvaraj and Sandaran 16 stated that an effective coordination and communication are fundamental to teamwork to enhance the emergency management quality. In addition, Barelli et al identified communication, coordination, and leadership as significant dimensions of teamwork in their publication “Soft skill in disaster preparedness and relief.” 17 The variable trends observed comparing the “post” data to the “pre” data seem to suggest that the field experience can modify the perceptions of response teams, underling that people do not have a clear idea of the operational meaning of teamwork and nontechnical skills.…”

Immersive Disaster Training Schema Based on Team Role-Playing

“…Role-playing can serve as an excellent model to facilitate visual teaching in virtual environments and enhance interaction and engagement among participants [28], while teamwork discourses have a direct impact on how members react [29]. In a series of works, role-playing has been proven to be helpful in understanding learning points and fostering responsibilities more directly [30,31].…”

Diagnóstico del impacto socioeconómico de la ayuda humanitaria en la crisis sanitaria por el covid-19: validez de un instrumento

“…La ayuda humanitaria no solo queda en la entrega de un bien o servicio, a continuación, se describe los principales criterios mediante los cuales se pretende evaluar la eficacia del uso de las asignaciones presupuestarias para promover el desarrollo nacional y/o local, aquí sí incluye brindar asistencia humanitaria (Selvaraj & Sandaran, 2019). En particular, estos contienen:  Cumplimiento del resultado teniendo en cuenta la comparación con los resultados de proyectos similares,  Validez dentro de la política general de asistencia al desarrollo,  Planificación de resultados en la prestación de asistencia,  Interacción bilateral con el estado receptor en políticas y otras áreas.…”