2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2014.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovering brain regions relevant to obsessive–compulsive disorder identification through bagging and transduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in this paper build on our previous work on variable selection (Parrado-Hernández et al 2014) and thoroughly extend a preliminary conference paper focused on assessing variable relevance (Gomez-Verdejo et al 2016). In particular, the main novel contributions of this paper over (Parrado-Hernández et al 2014) and (Gomez-Verdejo et al 2016) are:…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The results presented in this paper build on our previous work on variable selection (Parrado-Hernández et al 2014) and thoroughly extend a preliminary conference paper focused on assessing variable relevance (Gomez-Verdejo et al 2016). In particular, the main novel contributions of this paper over (Parrado-Hernández et al 2014) and (Gomez-Verdejo et al 2016) are:…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Ensemble learning, such as bagging and boosting, is thus an intuitive option to fuse the classification outputs from different weak classifiers to obtain more accurate results. The weak classifiers can be of any type, including SVM [14], decision tree [5], [15], [22], [46]- [48], and logistic regression [21]. Sparse representation classifiers have also been integrated into the boosting model as weak classifiers based on random subsets of reference images [37], [49].…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sparse representation classifiers have also been integrated into the boosting model as weak classifiers based on random subsets of reference images [37], [49]. The combination of weak classifiers is normally based on a predefined weighting scheme, such as the majority voting or averaging of probabilities in bagging [5], [14], [15], [22], [47], [48], or choosing the best performing weak classifier at each training iteration with error-based weight computation in boosting [21], [37], [46], [49]. While these weighting schemes are often effective, they are however predefined, greedy, and and might not reflect the best adaptation to the dataset.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 We aimed to compare structural brain abnormalities between patients with OCD with and without SP and the association between SP scores and the voxel-wise grey matter measurements from the sensorimotor cortex. Regional grey matter measurements provide a relatively stable marker of brain abnormality, thus allowing the identification of structural correlates of OCD [16][17][18][19] or specific clinical features. [20][21][22][23] We analyzed structural MRI data from 2 independent research centres located in São Paulo, Brazil, and Barcelona, Spain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%