2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23528-8_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovering Opinion Spammer Groups by Network Footprints

Abstract: Online reviews are an important source for consumers to evaluate products/services on the Internet (e.g. Amazon, Yelp, etc.). However, more and more fraudulent reviewers write fake reviews to mislead users. To maximize their impact and share effort, many spam attacks are organized as campaigns, by a group of spammers. In this paper, we propose a new two-step method to discover spammer groups and their targeted products. First, we introduce NFS (Network Footprint Score), a new measure that quantifies the likeli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with respect to prior work, it does not improve the spam/spammer detection accuracy. In a recent work, Ye and Akoglu propose GroupStrainer , a two‐step method to discover group spammers and their targeted products. The considered review network is a bipartite graph consisting of reviewer nodes connected to product nodes through review relations.…”
Section: Approaches To Credibility Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with respect to prior work, it does not improve the spam/spammer detection accuracy. In a recent work, Ye and Akoglu propose GroupStrainer , a two‐step method to discover group spammers and their targeted products. The considered review network is a bipartite graph consisting of reviewer nodes connected to product nodes through review relations.…”
Section: Approaches To Credibility Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [24] first introduce review graph to capture the relationships between entities. Spotting fraudster groups were then explored by network footprints [27], community discovery with sentiment analysis [2], social interactions for sparse group [26]. In-depth, Hooi et al [6] proposes an advanced dense subgraph mining for group fraudsters detection, targeting on detecting camouflage or hijacked accounts who manipulate their writing to look just like normal users.…”
Section: Related Work 21 Fraud Review Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent years have seen significant progress made in fraud detection. Current efforts mainly focused on extracting linguistic features (n-grams, POS, etc) and behavioral features [27,5]. However, linguistic features are ineffective when dealing with real-life fraud reviews [19], especially when linguistic features are easy to be imitated, a.k.a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FairPlay's use app authorizations varies from existing work its specialise in the temporal dimension, e.g., modifications within the selection of requested approvals, most importantly the "hazardous" ones. we have a tendency to observe that FairPlay identifies as well as makes use of a replacement relationship between malware and search ranking fraud.2.2 Graph mainly Viewpoint Spam Discovery Chart based approaches are prepared to tackle point of view spam [13], [14] Ye and Akoglu [24] evaluate the possibility of a product to be a spam project target, after that cluster spammers on a 2-hop subgraph evoked by the item with the very best chance worths. Akoglu et al [14] frame fraud detection as an authorized network classification downside as well as classify users and also product, that kind a bipartite network, employing a propagation-based mathematical program FairPlay's family member strategy varies because it identifies apps assessed during a contiguous amount, by teams of users with a history of evaluating apps alike.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%