2015
DOI: 10.1186/s13326-015-0021-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discovering relations between indirectly connected biomedical concepts

Abstract: BackgroundThe complexity and scale of the knowledge in the biomedical domain has motivated research work towards mining heterogeneous data from both structured and unstructured knowledge bases. Towards this direction, it is necessary to combine facts in order to formulate hypotheses or draw conclusions about the domain concepts. This work addresses this problem by using indirect knowledge connecting two concepts in a knowledge graph to discover hidden relations between them. The graph represents concepts as ve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative cases in the reference set were created by randomly combining the positive cases. While this is a common approach [ 13 , 15 , 53 ], it assumes that there are no undiscovered or missing relationships. Our error analysis showed this assumption to be incorrect, with at least two of the negative cases having a therapeutic relationship in reality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The negative cases in the reference set were created by randomly combining the positive cases. While this is a common approach [ 13 , 15 , 53 ], it assumes that there are no undiscovered or missing relationships. Our error analysis showed this assumption to be incorrect, with at least two of the negative cases having a therapeutic relationship in reality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the complexity of the transformation performed by the RDF2vec tool, this method provides no insight into a possible functional mechanism. Weissenborn et al created a knowledge graph based on a very large number of predicate types extracted from the biomedical literature, to which they applied machine learning [ 15 ]. They exclusively focused on literature and did not utilize the large amounts of knowledge contained in databases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Towards advanced scientific knowledge discovery, computers have been introduced to play an ever-greater role in the scientific process with automatic hypothesis generation (HG) based on machine learning. The study of automated HG has attracted considerable attention in recent years [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. The existing HG methods form three main groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second group covers methods that use a combination of advanced machine learning strategies to extract and analyze hidden connections from scientific publications. These methods include but not limited to association rules [10], [12], [16], text mining [13], [17], clustering and topic modeling [2], [18], [19], and others [14], [20], [21]. However, most of the previous studies fail to capture and utilize the dynamic evolution of the entity meaning, which can provide crucial information on inferring the future connectivity of the entities (e.g., medical terms).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent works use deep learning techniques to anchor a specific semantic ontology in the relevant literature [4]. A very promising application of medical literature is the discovery of new relations between concepts that may lead to breakthrough treatments [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%